Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Rafael Ratto de Moraes"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
  • rupiahtoto
  • rupiahtoto
  • rupiahtoto
  • rupiahtoto
  • rupiahtoto
  • rupiahtoto
  • slot deposit pulsa
  • bo slot gacor
  • toto togel
  • slot gacor
  • login rupiahtoto
  • rupiahtoto
  • rupiahtoto
  • rupiahtoto
  • Research Articles
    Physicochemical characterization of two bulk fill composites at different depths
    Guillermo Grazioli, Carlos Enrique Cuevas-Suárez, Leina Nakanishi, Alejandro Francia, Rafael Ratto de Moraes
    Restor Dent Endod 2021;46(3):e39.   Published online July 5, 2021
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2021.46.e39
    AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
    Objectives

    This study analyzed the physical-chemical behavior of 2 bulk fill resin composites (BFCs; Filtek Bulk Fill [FBF], and Tetric-N-Ceram Bulk Fill [TBF]) used in 2- and 4-mm increments and compared them with a conventional resin composite (Filtek Z250).

    Materials and Methods

    Flexural strength and elastic modulus were evaluated by using a 3-point bending test. Knoop hardness was measured at depth areas 0–1, 1–2, 2–3, and 3–4 mm. The translucency parameter was measured using an optical spectrophotometer. Real-time polymerization kinetics was analyzed using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.

    Results

    Flexural strength was similar among the materials, while TBF showed lower elastic modulus (Z250: 6.6 ± 1.3, FBF: 6.4 ± 0.9, TBF: 4.3 ± 1.3). The hardness of Z250 was similar only between 0–1 mm and 1–2 mm. Both BFCs had similar hardness until 2–3 mm, and showed significant decreases at 3–4 mm (FBF: 33.45 ± 1.95 at 0–1 mm to 23.19 ± 4.32 at 3–4 mm, TBF: 23.17 ± 2.51 at 0–1 mm to 15.11 ± 1.94 at 3–4 mm). The BFCs showed higher translucency than Z250. The polymerization kinetics of all the materials were similar at 2-mm increments. At 4-mm, only TBF had a similar degree of conversion compared with 2 mm.

    Conclusions

    The BFCs tested had similar performance compared to the conventional composite when used in up to 2-mm increments. When the increment was thicker, the BFCs were properly polymerized only up to 3 mm.

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Translucency of bulk‐fill composite materials: A systematic review
      Gaetano Paolone, Sofia Baldani, Niccolò De Masi, Mauro Mandurino, Giacomo Collivasone, Nicola Scotti, Enrico Gherlone, Giuseppe Cantatore
      Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry.2024; 36(7): 995.     CrossRef
    • Can composite packaging and selective enamel etching affect the clinical behavior of bulk-fill composite resin in posterior restorations? 24-month results of a randomized clinical trial
      Marcos de Oliveira BARCELEIRO, Chane TARDEM, Elisa Gomes ALBUQUERQUE, Leticia de Souza LOPES, Stella Soares MARINS, Luiz Augusto POUBEL, Roberta BARCELOS, Romina ÑAUPARI-VILLASANTE, Alessandro Dourado LOGUERCIO, Fernanda Signorelli CALAZANS
      Journal of Applied Oral Science.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • No-Cap Flowable Bulk-Fill Composite: Physico-Mechanical Assessment
      Abdullah Alshehri, Feras Alhalabi, Ali Robaian, Mohammed A. S. Abuelqomsan, Abdulrahman Alshabib, Eman Ismail, Faisal Alzamil, Nawaf Alotaibi, Hamad Algamaiah
      Polymers.2023; 15(8): 1847.     CrossRef
    • The Microhardness and Surface Roughness Assessment of Bulk-Fill Resin Composites Treated with and without the Application of an Oxygen-Inhibited Layer and a Polishing System: An In Vitro Study
      Ann Carrillo-Marcos, Giuliany Salazar-Correa, Leonor Castro-Ramirez, Marysela Ladera-Castañeda, Carlos López-Gurreonero, Hernán Cachay-Criado, Ana Aliaga-Mariñas, Alberto Cornejo-Pinto, Luis Cervantes-Ganoza, César Félix Cayo-Rojas
      Polymers.2022; 14(15): 3053.     CrossRef
    • 643 View
    • 12 Download
    • 5 Web of Science
    • 4 Crossref
    Close layer
    Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to composite submitted to different surface pretreatments
    Victor Hugo dos Santos, Sandro Griza, Rafael Ratto de Moraes, André Luis Faria-e-Silva
    Restor Dent Endod 2014;39(1):12-16.   Published online January 20, 2014
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2014.39.1.12
    AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
    Objectives

    Extensively destroyed teeth are commonly restored with composite resin before cavity preparation for indirect restorations. The longevity of the restoration can be related to the proper bonding of the resin cement to the composite. This study aimed to evaluate the microshear bond strength of two self-adhesive resin cements to composite resin.

    Materials and Methods

    Composite discs were subject to one of six different surface pretreatments: none (control), 35% phosphoric acid etching for 30 seconds (PA), application of silane (silane), PA + silane, PA + adhesive, or PA + silane + adhesive (n = 6). A silicone mold containing a cylindrical orifice (1 mm2 diameter) was placed over the composite resin. RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE) or BisCem (Bisco Inc.) self-adhesive resin cement was inserted into the orifices and light-cured. Self-adhesive cement cylinders were submitted to shear loading. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < 0.05).

    Results

    Independent of the cement used, the PA + Silane + Adhesive group showed higher microshear bond strength than those of the PA and PA + Silane groups. There was no difference among the other treatments. Unicem presented higher bond strength than BisCem for all experimental conditions.

    Conclusions

    Pretreatments of the composite resin surface might have an effect on the bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to this substrate.

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • An Innovative Method of Permanent Retention on Veneered Crowns
      Yugandhar Garlapati, Sampath Krishna Veni, Jashva Vamsi Kogila, Polisetty Siva Krishna, K. N. Anand Kumar
      Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Effect of Cement Type on Marginal Microleakage of Zirconia Crowns with or without Cervical Margin Relocation: An In Vitro Study
      RI Farah
      Operative Dentistry.2025; 50(2): 194.     CrossRef
    • Influence of mechanochemical treatment and oxygen inhibited layer on the adhesion of self-adhesive resin cement to bulk-fill composite resin
      Sreya Dutta, Samikhya Priyadarsani Sahu, Anushka Arora, Srikant Natarajan, Abhishek Parolia, Manuel Thomas
      Cumhuriyet Dental Journal.2024; 27(2): 79.     CrossRef
    • Substrate Rigidity Effect on CAD/CAM Restorations at Different Thicknesses
      César Rogério Pucci, Ana Paula Valente Pinho Mafetano, Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges, Guilherme Schmitt de Andrade, Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva, Cornelis J. Kleverlaan, João Paulo Mendes Tribst
      European Journal of Dentistry.2023; 17(04): 1020.     CrossRef
    • Microgap Formation between a Dental Resin-Matrix Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing Ceramic Restorative and Dentin after Various Surface Treatments and Artificial Aging
      Alexandros Galanopoulos, Dimitrios Dionysopoulos, Constantinos Papadopoulos, Petros Mourouzis, Kosmas Tolidis
      Applied Sciences.2023; 13(4): 2335.     CrossRef
    • Dental Luting Cements: An Updated Comprehensive Review
      Artak Heboyan, Anna Vardanyan, Mohmed Isaqali Karobari, Anand Marya, Tatevik Avagyan, Hamid Tebyaniyan, Mohammed Mustafa, Dinesh Rokaya, Anna Avetisyan
      Molecules.2023; 28(4): 1619.     CrossRef
    • Effect of full-step versus simplified resin cement luting strategies on the push-out bond strength of indirect resin composite restorations bonded to dentin
      Bianca Cristina Dantas da Silva, Isabelle Helena Gurgel de Carvalho, Taciana Emília Leite Vila-Nova, Gabriela Monteiro de Araújo, Boniek Castillo Dutra Borges, Marília Regalado Galvão Rabelo Caldas, Isauremi Vieira de Assunção, Mutlu Özcan, Rodrigo Othávi
      Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology.2023; 37(24): 3552.     CrossRef
    • Effect of various polymerization protocols on the cytotoxicity of conventional and self-adhesive resin-based luting cements
      Ece Irem Oguz, Ufuk Hasanreisoglu, Sadullah Uctasli, Mutlu Özcan, Mehmet Kiyan
      Clinical Oral Investigations.2020; 24(3): 1161.     CrossRef
    • Repair bond strength of resin composite to three aged CAD/CAM blocks using different repair systems
      Pinar Gul, Latife Altınok-Uygun
      The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics.2020; 12(3): 131.     CrossRef
    • Evaluation of the Surface Characteristics of Dental CAD/CAM Materials after Different Surface Treatments
      Konstantinos Papadopoulos, Kimon Pahinis, Kyriaki Saltidou, Dimitrios Dionysopoulos, Effrosyni Tsitrou
      Materials.2020; 13(4): 981.     CrossRef
    • Adhesive Systems Used in Indirect Restorations Cementation: Review of the Literature
      Cristian Abad-Coronel, Belén Naranjo, Pamela Valdiviezo
      Dentistry Journal.2019; 7(3): 71.     CrossRef
    • Effects of different etching methods and bonding procedures on shear bond strength of orthodontic metal brackets applied to different CAD/CAM ceramic materials
      S. Kutalmış Buyuk, Ahmet Serkan Kucukekenci
      The Angle Orthodontist.2018; 88(2): 221.     CrossRef
    • Ceramic repairs with resins: silanization protocols
      Teresa Cristina Vasconcelos dos Santos
      Journal of Dental Health, Oral Disorders & Therapy.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Influence of different surface treatments on bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to resin cement
      Meltem Bektaş Kömürcüoğlu, Elçin Sağırkaya, Ayça Tulga
      The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics.2017; 9(6): 439.     CrossRef
    • Adhesive bonding to polymer infiltrated ceramic
      Judith SCHWENTER, Fredy SCHMIDLI, Roland WEIGER, Jens FISCHER
      Dental Materials Journal.2016; 35(5): 796.     CrossRef
    • Orthodontic bracket bonding to glazed full-contour zirconia
      Ji-Young Kwak, Hyo-Kyung Jung, Il-Kyung Choi, Tae-Yub Kwon
      Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics.2016; 41(2): 106.     CrossRef
    • Effect of Silanization on Microtensile Bond Strength of Different Resin Cements to a Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramic
      Cristina Parise Gré, Renan C de Ré Silveira, Shizuma Shibata, Carlo TR Lago, Luiz CC Vieira
      The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice.2016; 17(2): 149.     CrossRef
    • Effects of air abrasion with alumina or glass beads on surface characteristics of CAD/CAM composite materials and the bond strength of resin cements
      ARAO Nobuaki, YOSHIDA Keiichi, SAWASE Takashi
      Journal of Applied Oral Science.2015; 23(6): 629.     CrossRef
    • Resin cement to indirect composite resin bonding: Effect of various surface treatments
      Omer Kirmali, Cagatay Barutcugil, Osman Harorli, Alper Kapdan, Kursat Er
      Scanning.2015; 37(2): 89.     CrossRef
    • Impact of different adhesives on work of adhesion between CAD/CAM polymers and resin composite cements
      Christine Keul, Manuel Müller-Hahl, Marlis Eichberger, Anja Liebermann, Malgorzata Roos, Daniel Edelhoff, Bogna Stawarczyk
      Journal of Dentistry.2014; 42(9): 1105.     CrossRef
    • Effect of Plasma Deposition Using Low-Power/Non-thermal Atmospheric Pressure Plasma on Promoting Adhesion of Composite Resin to Enamel
      Geum-Jun Han, Jae-Hoon Kim, Sung-No Chung, Bae-Hyeock Chun, Chang-Keun Kim, Byeong-Hoon Cho
      Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing.2014; 34(4): 933.     CrossRef
    • Bonding efficacy of a self-adhesive resin cement to enamel and dentin
      Linhu Wang, Haixing Xu, Songyang Li, Bin Shi, Rong Li, Mingfu Ye, Jing Yang
      Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Mater. Sci. Ed..2014; 29(6): 1307.     CrossRef
    • 516 View
    • 4 Download
    • 22 Crossref
    Close layer

    Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
    Close layer
    TOP