Effect of wetness on the enamel bonding

Keun-Ho Ko; Young-Gon Cho; Cheul-Hee Jin; Sang-Hoon Yoo; Jong-Uk Kim; Byung-Cheul Park; Young-Jae Ki; Hee-Young Choi; Jong-Jin Kim

doi:10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.3.205

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 29(3); 2004 > Article

Original Article Effect of wetness on the enamel bonding: Keun-Ho Ko, Young-Gon Cho, Cheul-Hee Jin, Sang-Hoon Yoo, Jong-Uk Kim, Byung-Cheul Park, Young-Jae Ki, Hee-Young Choi, Jong-Jin Kim; 2004;29(3):-211.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.3.205
Published online: May 31, 2004

Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, Korea.

Corresponding author: Young-Gon Cho. Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, 421 Susuk-dong, Dong-gu, Gwangju, 501-825, Korea. Tel: 82-62-220-3840, Fax: 82-62-232-9064, ygcho@mail.chosun.ac.kr

279 Views
1 Download
1 Crossref

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
REFERENCES

Abstract

This study evaluated the microleakage and interfacial gap between enamel and composite resin under the dry and wet condition of the enamel surface. V shaped class 5 cavities were prepared on the occlusal portion of extracted human molars. Samples were divided into three groups: D group (air dry for 10-15 s), BD group (blot dry with moist cotton pellet), and DR group (air dry for 10-15 s and rewet with Aqua-Prep F for 20 s).

Cavities were filled using Aelitefil composite resin after applied One-Step. Microleakage was tested by 2% methylene blue dye solution and the data were statistically analysed by Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test. Also Enamel-resin interface was observed under SEM. Group BD showed statistically lower microleakage than group D (p < 0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference between group BD and DR (p > 0.05). At the enamel-resin interface, group D showed the gap of 2 µm thickness, but group BD and DR showed close adaptation.

In conclusion, the use of blot dry and rewetting agent (Aqua-Prep F) resulted in decreased microleakage and improved adhesion between enamel and resin when using One-Step.
Keywords: Microleakage; Interfacial gap; Air dry; Blot dry; Rewet

Figure 1

Number of microleakage scores of each group

Figure 2

D (dry) group showed the gap (G) of 2 µm thickness at the enamel (E)-resin (R) interface (SEM ×5,000)

Figure 3

BD (blot dry) group showed close adaptaition (CA) at the enamel (E)-resin (R) interface (SEM ×5,000)

Figure 4

DR (dry/rewet with Aqua-Prep F) group showed close adaptation (CA) at the enamel (E)-resin (R) interface (SEM ×5,000)

Table 1

Materials used in this study and their chemical composition

BPDM, biphenyl dimethacrylate; Bis-GMA, bisphenol glycidyl methacrylate;

HEMA, 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate; TEGDMA, triethylenglycol dimethacrylate

Table 2

Group classification according to the surface condition of cavity

Table 3

Distribution of microleakage scores and means at enamel margins

Table 4

Statistical analysis to enamel microleakage among groups by Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test

^*: significant differences (p < 0.05)

REFERENCES

1. Amaral CM, Hara AT, Pimenta LAF, Rodrigues AL Jr. Microleakage of hydrophilic systems in class V composite restorations. Am J Dent. 2001;14(1):31-34.PubMed
2. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechets P, Vanherle G. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials. Am J Dent. 2001;14(3):170-176.PubMed
3. Fanchi M, Breschi L. Effects of acid-etching solutions on human enamel and dentin. Quintessence Int. 1995;26: 431-435.PubMed
4. Kanca J. Resin bonding to wet substrate. I. Bonding to dentin. Quintessence Int. 1992;23(1):39-41.PubMed
5. Moll K, Gartner T, Haller B. Effect of moist bonding on composite/enamel bond strength. Am J Dent. 2002;15(2):85-70.PubMed
6. Perdigão J, Frankenberger R. Effect of solvent and rewetting time on dentin adhesion. Quintessence Int. 2001;32: 385-390.PubMed
7. Swift EJ. Enamel and dentin bonding. J Esthet Dent. 2000;12(3):119-201.
8. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28(3):215-235.PubMed
9. Pashley DH, Ciucci B, Sano H, Horner JA. Permeability of dentin to adhesive agents. Quintessence Int. 1993;24: 618-631.PubMed
10. Gwinnett AJ. Dentin bond strength after air drying and rewetting. Am J Dent. 1994;7(3):144-148.PubMed
11. Tay FR, Gwinnett JA, Wei SHY. Micromorphological spectrum of acid conditioned dentin following the application of a water-based adhesive. Dent Mater. 1998;14: 329-338.PubMed
12. Nakajima M, Kanemura N, Pereira PNR, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Comparative microtensile bond strength and SEM analysis of bonding to wet and dry dentin. Am J Dent. 2000;13(6):324-328.PubMed
13. Gallo JR, Henderson M, Burgess JO. Shear bond strength to moist and dry dentin of four dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent. 2000;13(5):267-270.PubMed
14. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Tay FR, Agee KA, Lee KW. Solvation of dried dentin matrix by water and other polar solvents. Am J Dent. 2002;15: 97-102.PubMed
15. Braga RR, Cesar PF, Gonzaga CC. Tensile bond strength of filled and unfilled adhesives to dentin. Am J Dent. 2000;13(2):73-76.PubMed
16. Gwinnett AJ. Moist vs. dry dentin: Its effect on shear bond strength. Am J Dent. 1992;5: 127-129.PubMed
17. Kanca J 3rd. Effect of resin primer solvents and surface wetness on resin composite bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent. 1992;5: 213-215.PubMed
18. Ritter AV, Heymann HO, Swift EJ, Perdigao J, Rosa BT. Effects of different re-wetting techniques on dentin shear bond strengths. J Esthet Dent. 2000;12(2):85-96.Article PubMed
19. Perdigão J, Van Meerbeek B, Lopes MM, Ambrose WW. The effect of a re-wetting agent on dentin bonding. Dent Mater. 1999;15: 282-295.Article PubMed
20. Pilo R, Cardash HS, Oz-Ari B, Ben-Amar A. Effect of preliminary treatment of the dentin surface on the shear bond strength of resin composite to dentin. Oper Dent. 2001;26: 569-575.PubMed
21. Kanca J. Resin bonding to wet substrate. II. Bonding to enamel. Quintessence Int. 1992;23(9):625-627.PubMed
22. Jain P, Stewart GP. Effect of dentin primer on shear bond strength of composite resin to moist and dry enamel. Oper Dent. 2000;25: 51-56.PubMed
23. Gordan VV, Vargas MA, Denehy GE. Interfacial ultrastructure of the enamel/dentin bonding agents. Am J Dent. 1998;11: 13-16.PubMed
24. Buonocore MG. Simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955;28: 849-853.
25. Abdalla AI, Garcia-Godoy F. Morphological characterization of single bottle adhesives and vital dentin interface. Am J Dent. 2002;15(1):31-34.PubMed
26. Baratieri LN, Canabarro S, Lopes GC, Ritter AV. Effecct of resin viscosity and enamel beveling on the clinical performance of class V composite restorations: Three-year Results. Oper Dent. 2003;28(5):482-487.PubMed
27. Barghi N, Knight GT, Berry TG. Comparing two methods of moisture control in bonding to enamel: A clinical study. Oper Dent. 1991;16: 130-135.PubMed
28. Knight GT, Berry TG, Barghi N, Burns TR. Effects of two methods of moisture control on marginal microleakage between resin composite and etched enamel: a clinical study. Int J Prosthodont. 1993;6(5):475-479.PubMed
29. Perdigão J, Swift EJ, Heymann HO, Malek MA. Effect of a re-wetting agent on the performance of acetone-based dentin adhesives. Am J Dent. 1998;11: 207-213.PubMed
30. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SHY. Ultrastructure of the resin-dentin interface following reversible and irreversible rewetting. Am J Dent. 1997;10(2):77-82.PubMed
31. Swift EJ. Resin desensitizers. J Esthet Dent. 1999;11(6):289-290.

Tables & Figures