Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

Search
Advanced Search
OPEN ACCESS
mobile search button mobile menu button

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 27(3); 2002 > Article
Original Article 1 year follow-up study of direct and indirect composite restorations
Sung-Ho Park
2002;27(3):-289.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.3.284
Published online: May 31, 2002

Associate Professor, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.

Copyright © 2002 Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry

  • 2,176 Views
  • 5 Download
  • 1 Crossref
prev next
Full Article

Download PDF Download PDF

  • Background
    The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the direct and indirect composite restorations which had been placed for 1 year.
  • Methods
    The composite restorations which had been placed between 1999. Mar and 1999, Dec was evaluated after 1 year. For direct restorations, Spectrum (Dentsply, USA) and Z100 (3M, USA) were used in the anterior teeth and Surefil (Dentsply, USA) were used. For class V restorations of anterior and posterior teeth, Spectrum was used. For indirect restorations, Targis/Vectris system (Vivadent/Ivoclar, Liechtenstein) was used. 2 examiners evaluated marginal quality, proximal contact, discoloration, presence of 2nd caries, loss of filling and hypersensitivity of restorations. The restorations was clinically evaluated by modified methods based on USPHS.
  • Results
    60 teeth were evaluated. 59 were clinically acceptable and 1 restoration which was placed in class v cavity in the posterior tooth was fallen out. In most cases, the restorations were clinically acceptable. For restorations which had been directly placed in the class II cavities, loose proximal contact was indicated as the main complaints.
  • Conclusions
    Most of Anterior and posterior restorations which bad been directly or indirectly placed for 1 year were clinically acceptable. For posterior teeth, loose proximal contact was indicated as the main problem in the directly placed Class II restorations. Long term clinical study is needed.
  • Keywords: Composite resin; Direct restoration; Indirect restoration; Complication
  • 1. Barnes DM, Blank LW, Thompson VP, Holston AM, Gingell JC. A 5- and 8-year clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin. Quintessence Int. 1991;22: 143-151.PubMed
  • 2. Wilson NHF, Margaret AW, Wastell DG, Smith GA. A clinical trial of a visible light cured posterior composite resin restorative materials: five-year results. Quintessence Int. 1988;19: 675-681.PubMed
  • 3. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Willems G, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Clinical and semiquantitative amrgin analysis of four tooth-coloured inlay systems at 3 years. J Dent. 1995;23: 329-338.PubMed
  • 4. Bessing C, Lundqvist P. A 1 year clinical examination of indirect composite resin inlay: a preliminary report. Quintessence Int. 1991;22: 153-157.PubMed
  • 5. Browning WD, Dennison JB. A survey of failure modes in composite resin restorations. Oper Dent. 1996;21: 160-166.PubMed
  • 6. Powell LV, Johnson GH, Gordon GE. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restoration. Oper Dent. 1995;20: 7-13.PubMed
  • 7. Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Two-year clinical evaluation of two dentine-adhesive systems in cervical lesion. J Dent. 1993;21: 195-202.PubMed
  • 8. Fuks AB, chosack A, Eidelman E. A Two-year evaluation in vivo and in vitro of class 2 composites. Oper Dent. 1990;15: 219-223.PubMed
Table 1
Teeth examined at recall
jkacd-27-284-i001.jpg
Table 2
Evaluation lists for anterior teeth
jkacd-27-284-i002.jpg
Table 3
Evaluation list for posterior teeth
jkacd-27-284-i003.jpg
Table 4
Performance of the restorations for anterior teeth reviewed after 12 months in clinical service
jkacd-27-284-i004.jpg
Table 5
Performance of the restorations for posterior teeth reviewed after 12 months in clinical service
jkacd-27-284-i005.jpg

Tables & Figures

REFERENCES

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Effec of different zirconia primers on shear bond strengths of composite resin to bonded zirconia
      Hong-Bing Shi, Tae-Seok Kim, Jae-Seok Ahn, Jung-Hwan Lee
      Journal of Korean Acedemy of Dental Technology.2016; 38(3): 135.     CrossRef

    • ePub LinkePub Link
    • Cite
      CITE
      export Copy Download
      Close
      Download Citation
      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.
      Format:
      • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
      • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
      Include:
      • Citation for the content below
      1 year follow-up study of direct and indirect composite restorations
      J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2002;27(3):284-289.   Published online May 31, 2002
      DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.3.284
      Close
    • XML DownloadXML Download
    1 year follow-up study of direct and indirect composite restorations
    1 year follow-up study of direct and indirect composite restorations

    Teeth examined at recall

    Evaluation lists for anterior teeth

    Evaluation list for posterior teeth

    Performance of the restorations for anterior teeth reviewed after 12 months in clinical service

    Performance of the restorations for posterior teeth reviewed after 12 months in clinical service
    Table 1 Teeth examined at recall

    Table 2 Evaluation lists for anterior teeth

    Table 3 Evaluation list for posterior teeth

    Table 4 Performance of the restorations for anterior teeth reviewed after 12 months in clinical service

    Table 5 Performance of the restorations for posterior teeth reviewed after 12 months in clinical service

    Table 1

    Table 2

    Table 3

    Table 4

    Table 5

    Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
    © The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.
    Close layer
    TOP