Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

Search
Advanced Search
OPEN ACCESS
mobile search button mobile menu button

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 27(4); 2002 > Article
Original Article Influence of flowable composite lining on microleakage at the gingival dentin margin
Jung Min Lee, Young Kyung Kim, Jeong-won Park
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2002;27(4):-402.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.4.394
Published online: January 14, 2002

Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University

Copyright © 2002 The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 674 Views
  • 0 Download
prev next
Full Article

Download PDF Download PDF

Fig. 1.
Dye leakage test score. O=no leakage, 1; leakage within half of the gingival wall, 2; leakage within the gingival wall, 3; leakage pass the gingival wall to the axial
jkacd-27-394f1.jpg

(D=dentin, CR=composite resin, ER=embedding resin)

Table 1.
Filling techniques investigated in this study
Group Flowable composite lining and its thickness Incremental insertion technique of overlying composite resin
1 Not used horizontal
2 Not used oblique
3 0.5 - 1 mm horizontal
4 0.5 - 1 mm oblique
5 2 - 3 mm horizontal
6 2 - 3 mm oblique
Table 2.
Frequency of dye penetration scores
Groups Score
 Total
0 1 2 3
1 0 3 8 9 20
2 0 10 7 3 20
3 0 8 2 10 20
4 0 7 3 10 20
5 0 5 4 11 20
6 0 6 2 12 20
Total 0 39 26 55 120

No significant difference between groups(p>0.05).

Table 3.
Frequency of dye penetration scores for oblique incremental fillings
Groups Score
 Total
0 1 2 3
2 0 10 7 3 20
4 0 7 3 10 20
6 0 6 2 12 20
Total 0 23 12 25 60

Groups connected by a line are statistically equivalent.

Table 4.
Frequency of dye penetration scores for horizontal incremental fillings
Groups Score
 Total
0 1 2 3
1 0 3 8 9 20
3 0 8 2 10 20
5 0 5 4 11 20
Total 0 16 14 30 60

Groups connected by a line are statistically equivalent.

  • 1. Hansen E K. Contraction pattern of composite resins in dentin cavities. Scand J. Dent. Res. 90:480-483. 1982.ArticlePubMed
  • 2. De Gee A J, Davidson C L, Smith A A. Modified dilatometer of continuous recording of volumetric polymerization shrinkage of composite restorative materials. J Dent. 9:36-42. 1981.PubMed
  • 3. Feilzer A J, De Gee A J, Davidson C L. Curing contraction of composites and glass ionomer cements. J Prosthet. Dent. 59:297-300. 1988.ArticlePubMed
  • 4. Bra¨nnstro¨m M. Communication between the oral cavity and the dental pulp associated with restorative treatment. Oper Dent. 9:57-68. 1984.PubMed
  • 5. Qvist V, Qvist J, Mjo¨r I A. Placement and longevity of tooth-colored restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol. Scand. 48:305-311. 1990.ArticlePubMed
  • 6. Kim J H, Park J.-W, Park J.-H, Kim S K. Bond strength and microleakage in resin bonding to tooth structure. J Kor. Acad. Conserv. Dent. 24:570-577. 1999.
  • 7. Lutz F, Krejci I, Oldenburg T R. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: A new restorative technique. Quint Int. 17:777-784. 1986.
  • 8. Koenigsberg S, Fuks A, Grajower R. The effect of three filling techniques on marginal leakage around Class II composite resin restorations in vitro. Quint Int. 20:117-121. 1989.
  • 9. Dietschi D, Siebenthal G D, Nevei-Rosenstand L, Holz J. Influence of the restorative technique and new adhesives on the dentin marginal seal and adaptation of resin composite Class II restorations: an in vitro evaluation. Quint Int. 26:717-727. 1995.
  • 10. Krejci I, Sparr D, Lutz F. A three-sited light curing technique for conventional Class II composite resin restorations. Quint Int. 18:125-131. 1987.
  • 11. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dent Mater. 7:107-113. 1991.ArticlePubMed
  • 12. Neiva I F, De Andrada M A C, Baratieri L N, Monteiro S Jr., Ritter A V. An in vitro study of the effect of restorative technique on marginal leakage in posterior composites. Oper Dent. 23:282-289. 1998.PubMed
  • 13. Rada E R. Class II direct composite resin restorations with beta-quartz glass-ceramic inserts. Quint Int. 24:793-798. 1993.
  • 14. Bertolotti R. Posterior composite technique utilizing directed polymerization shrinkage and a novel matrix. J. Practical Periodontics and Aesthet Dent. 3:53-58. 1991.
  • 15. Crim G A, Chapman K W. Reducing microleakage in Class II restorations: An in vitro study. Quint Int. 25:781-785. 1994.
  • 16. Swift E J, Triolo P T Jr., Barkmeier W W, Bird J L, Bounds S J. Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives. 9: 100-104. 1996.PMC
  • 17. Leevailoj C, Cochran M A, Matis B A, Moore B K, Platt J A. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners. Oper Dent. 26:302-307. 2001.PubMed
  • 18. Moon J.-H, Ko K.-H. The effect of flowable resin lining on the marginal microleakage of condensable resin restoration. J. Kor. Acad. Conserv Dent. 26:16-22. 2001.
  • 19. Kemp-Scholte C M, Davidson C L. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J. Dent Res. 69:1240-1243. 1990.PubMed
  • 20. Kemp-Scholte C M, Davidson C L. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J. Prosthet Dent. 64:658-664. 1990.ArticlePubMed
  • 21. Rooklidge E, Boyer D, Bouschlicher M. Cusp deformation by shrinkage of condensable composite. J Dent. Res. 78:Abstracts of Papers. p399; Abstract 2349. 1999.
  • 22. Unterbrink G L, Liebenberg W H. Flowable resin composites as “filled adhesives”: Literature review and clinical recommendations. Quint Int. 30:249-257. 1999.
  • 23. Belli S, Inokoshi S, zer F, Pereira P N R, Ogata M, Tagami J. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of class II adhesive composite restorations. Oper Dent. 26:70-75. 2001.PubMed
  • 24. Tung F F, Estafan D, Scherer W. Microleakage of a condensable resin composite: An in vitro investigation. Quint Int. 31:430-434. 2000.
  • 25. Chuang S F, Liu J K, Jin Y T. Microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restorations with flowable composite linings. Oper Dent. 26:193-200. 2001.
  • 26. Beznos C. Microleakage at the Cervical Margin of Composite Class II Cavities with Different Restorative Techniques. Oper Dent. 26:60-69. 2001.PubMed
  • 27. Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Celis J P, Roos J R, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Assessment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent. Res. 72:1434-1442. 1993.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 28. Davidson C L, De Gee A J, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent. Res. 63:1396-1399. 1984.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 29. Jang B S, Kim S K. Bonding of resin inlay to glass-ionomer base with various treatments in inlay surface. J Kor. Acad. Conserv. Dent. 25:399-406. 2000.
  • 30. Carvalho R M, Pereira J C, Yoshiyama M, Pashley D H. A review of polymerization contraction: The influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent. 21:17-24. 1996.PubMed
  • 31. Feilzer A J, De Gee A J, Davidson C L. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of restoration. J. Dent Res. 66:1636-1639. 1987.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 32. Kinomoto Y, Torii M. Photoelastic analysis of polymerization contraction stress in resin composite restoration. J Dent. 26:165-171. 1998.PubMed
  • 33. Bayne S C, Thompson J Y, Swift E D Jr., Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J. Dent Ass. 129:567-577. 1998.Article
  • 34. Leinfelder K F, Prasad A. A new condensable composite for the restoration of posterior teeth. Dent Today 17:112-116. 1998.
  • 35. The Dental Advisor : Packable composites. The Dental Advisor 16:1-4. 1999.
  • 36. Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater. 15:128-137. 1999.ArticlePubMed
  • 37. Tolidis K, Setcos J C. Initial degree of polymerization shrinkage exhibited by flowable composite resins. J Dent. Res. 78:Abstracts of Papers p482 Abstract 3015. 1999.
  • 38. Alomari Q D, Reinhardt J W, Boyer D B. Effect of liners on cusp deflection and gap formation in composite restorations. Oper Dent. 26:406-411. 2001.PubMed
  • 39. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Restoration quality in relation to wedge-mediated light channeling. Quint Int. 23:763-767. 1992.
  • 40. Ciamponi A L, Del Portillo Lujan V A, Ferreira Santos J F. Effectiveness of reflective wedges on the polymerization of composite resins. Quint Int. 25:599-602. 1994.
  • 41. Barnes D M, Holston A M, Strassler H E, Shires P J. Evaluation of clinical performance of twelve posterior composite resins with a standardized placement technique. J Esthet. Dent. 2:36-43. 1990.ArticlePubMed
  • 42. Eick J D, Welch F H. Polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins and its possible influence on postoperative sensitivity. Quint Int. 17:103-111. 1986.
  • 43. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas W H. Do dental composites always shrink toward the light? J Dent. Res. 77:1435-1445. 1998.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 44. Ferracane J L. Current trends in dental composites. Critical Reviews of Oral Biology and Medicine 6:302-318. 1995.ArticlePDF
  • 45. Pires J A F, Cvitko E, Denehy G E, Swift E J Jr. Effects of curing tip distance on light intensity and composite resin microhardness. Quint Int. 24:517-521. 1993.
  • 46. Rueggeberg F A, Jordan D M. Effect of light-tip distance on polymerization of resin composite. Int J. Prosthet. 6:364-370. 1993.
  • 47. Dang H M, Sarrett D C. Wear behavior of flowable and condensable composite resins. J Dent. Res. 78 Abstracts of Papers p447 Abstract 2736. 1999.
  • 48. Ulusu T, Oztas N, Tulunoglu O. Comparison of the effect of insertion techniques of a resin composite on dentinal adaptation of two visible light-cured bases: Direct evaluation versus a replica technique. Quint Int. 27:63-68. 1996.

Tables & Figures

REFERENCES

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      • ePub LinkePub Link
      • Cite
        CITE
        export Copy Download
        Close
        Download Citation
        Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.
        Format:
        • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
        • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
        Include:
        • Citation for the content below
        Influence of flowable composite lining on microleakage at the gingival dentin margin
        J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2002;27(4):394-402.   Published online January 14, 2002
        DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.4.394
        Close
      • XML DownloadXML Download
      Figure
      • 0
      Influence of flowable composite lining on microleakage at the gingival dentin margin
      Image
      Fig. 1. Dye leakage test score. O=no leakage, 1; leakage within half of the gingival wall, 2; leakage within the gingival wall, 3; leakage pass the gingival wall to the axial

      Fig. 1.

      Influence of flowable composite lining on microleakage at the gingival dentin margin
      Group Flowable composite lining and its thickness Incremental insertion technique of overlying composite resin
      1 Not used horizontal
      2 Not used oblique
      3 0.5 - 1 mm horizontal
      4 0.5 - 1 mm oblique
      5 2 - 3 mm horizontal
      6 2 - 3 mm oblique
      Groups Score
      		 Total
      0 1 2 3
      1 0 3 8 9 20
      2 0 10 7 3 20
      3 0 8 2 10 20
      4 0 7 3 10 20
      5 0 5 4 11 20
      6 0 6 2 12 20
      Total 0 39 26 55 120
      Groups Score
      		 Total
      0 1 2 3
      2 0 10 7 3 20
      4 0 7 3 10 20
      6 0 6 2 12 20
      Total 0 23 12 25 60
      Groups Score
      		 Total
      0 1 2 3
      1 0 3 8 9 20
      3 0 8 2 10 20
      5 0 5 4 11 20
      Total 0 16 14 30 60
      Table 1. Filling techniques investigated in this study

      Table 2. Frequency of dye penetration scores

      No significant difference between groups(p>0.05).

      Table 3. Frequency of dye penetration scores for oblique incremental fillings

      Groups connected by a line are statistically equivalent.

      Table 4. Frequency of dye penetration scores for horizontal incremental fillings

      Groups connected by a line are statistically equivalent.

      Table 1.

      Table 2.

      Table 3.

      Table 4.

      Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
      © The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.
      Close layer
      TOP