REFERENCES

• 1. Kramer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am J Dent. 2000;13: 60D-76D.PubMed
• 2. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental luting agents: a review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80: 280-301.ArticlePubMed
• 3. Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA, Haselton DR. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81: 135-141.ArticlePubMed
• 4. Inokoshi S, Willems G, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Dual-cure luting composites. Part I. Filler particle distribution. J Oral Rehabil. 1993;20: 133-146.ArticlePubMed
• 5. Sjogren G, Molin M, Van Dijken J, Bergman M. Ceramic inlays(Cerec) cemented with either a dual-cured or a chemically cured composite resin luting agent. A 2-year clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand. 1995;53: 325-330.ArticlePubMed
• 6. Casson AM, Glyn Jones JC, Youngson CC, Wood DJ. The effect of luting media on fracture resistance of a flame sprayed all-ceramic crown. J Dent. 2001;29: 539-544.PubMed
• 7. Burke FJ. The effect of variations in bonding procedure on fracture resistance of dentin-bonded all-ceramic crowns. Quintessence Int. 1995;26: 293-300.PubMed
• 8. Dietschi D, Maeder M, Meyer JM, Holz J. In vitro resistance to fracture of porcelain inlays bonded to tooth. Quintessence Int. 1990;21: 823-831.PubMed
• 9. Cook WD, Thomasz F. A photocured composite resin with an apparent infinite depth of cure. Aust Dent J. 1983;28: 243.PubMed
• 10. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28: 215-235.PubMed
• 11. Sensat ML, Brackett WW, Meinberg TA, Beatty MW. Clinical evaluation of two adhesive composite cements for the suppression of dentinal cold sensitivity. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88: 50-53.ArticlePubMed
• 12. Ogawa T, Tanaka M, Matsuya S, Aizawa S, Koyano K. Setting characteristics of five autopolymerizing resins measured by an oscillating rheometer. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85: 170-176.ArticlePubMed
• 13. Sanares AM, Itthagarun A, King NM, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Adverse surface interactions between one-bottle light-cured adhesive and chemical-cured composites. Dent Mater. 2001;17: 542-556.PubMed
• 14. Kious AR, Roberts HW, Brackett WW. Film thickness of recently introduced luting cements. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;101: 189-192.PubMed
• 15. Goracci C, Cury AH, Cantoro A, Papacchini F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength and interfacial properties of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cements used to lute composite onlays under different seating forces. J Adhes Dent. 2006;8: 327-335.PubMed
• 16. Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R, Meister C, Petschelt A. In: Mörmann WH, editor. Curing contraction in thin bonding composite resin layers. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Restoration. The state of art of the Cerec method. 1991;Berlin: Quintessence; 577-590.
• 17. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dent Mater. 1991;7: 107-113.ArticlePubMed
• 18. Davidson CL, De Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res. 1984;63: 146-148.PubMed
• 19. Davidson CL. Resisting the curing contraction with adhesive composites. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;55: 446-447.ArticlePubMed
• 20. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of restoration. J Dent Res. 1987;66: 1636-1639.ArticlePubMedPDF
• 21. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Increased wall-to-wall curing contraction in thin bonded resin layers. J Dent Res. 1989;68: 48-50.ArticlePubMedPDF
• 22. Gemalmaz D, Kkrer D. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of marginal fit of class II ceromer inlays. J Oral Rehabil. 2006;33: 436-442.ArticlePubMed
• 23. D'Arcangelo C, Cinelli M, De Angelis F, D'Amario M. The effect of resin cement film thickness on the pullout strength of a fiber-reinforced post system. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;98: 193-198.ArticlePubMed
• 24. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents:a review. Dent Mater. 1995;11: 117-125.ArticlePubMed
• 25. Li ZC, White SN. Mechanical properties of dental luting cements. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81: 597-609.ArticlePubMed
• 26. Shono Y, Ogawa T, Terashita M, Carvalho RM, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. Regional measurement of resin-dentin bonding as an array. J Dent Res. 1999;78: 699-705.ArticlePubMedPDF
• 27. ISO 4049 : International Standard Dentistry Resin-based dental filling materials. 1998.
• 28. Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of dental hard tissues. 1998;Tokyo: Quintessence; 51-53.
• 29. Carvalho RM, Pegoraro TA, Tay FR, Pegoraro LF, Silva NRFA, Pashley DH. Adhesive permeability affects coupling of resin cements that utilise self-etching primers to dentine. J Dent. 2004;32: 55-65.ArticlePubMed
• 30. Audenino G, Bresciano ME, Bassi F, Carossa S. In vitro evaluation of fit of adhesively luted ceramic inlays. Int J Prosthodont. 1999;12: 342-347.PubMed
• 31. Molin MK, Karlsson SL, Kristiansen MS. Influence of film thickness on joint bend strength of a ceramic/resin composite joint. Dent Mater. 1996;12: 245-249.ArticlePubMed
• 32. Wassell RW, Gagliano G. Effects of adhesive fixed prosthesis retainer design on resultant resin luting agent thickness. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80: 479-484.ArticlePubMed
• 33. Choi KK, Condon JR, Ferracane JL. The effects of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite. J Dent Res. 2000;79: 812-817.ArticlePubMedPDF
• 34. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM, Wei SH. Resin permeation into acid-conditioned, moist, and dry dentin: a paradigm using water-free adhesive primers. J Dent Res. 1996;75: 1034-1044.ArticlePubMedPDF
• 35. Cho MW, Park SH, K JR, Choi KK. The bonding durability of resin cements . J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2007;32: 343-355.Article
• 36. Mak YF, Lai SCN, Cheung GSP, Chan AW, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Micro-tensile bond testing of resin cements to dentin and an indirect resin composite. Dent Mater. 2002;18: 609-621.ArticlePubMed
• 37. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yiu CKY, Sanares AM, Wei SW. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and self-cured or dual-cured composites. Part I. Single-step self-etch adhesive. J Adhes Dent. 2003;5: 27-40.PubMed
• 38. Ikemura K, Endo T. Effect on adhesion of new polymerization initiator systems comprising 5- monosubstituted barbituric acids, aromatic sulphonate amides, and tert-butyl peroxymaleic acid in dental adhesive resin. J Appl Polym Sci. 1999;72: 1655-1668.Article
• 39. Nyunt MM, Imai Y. Adhesion to dentin with resin using sulfinic acid initiator system. Dent Mater J. 1996;15: 175-182.ArticlePubMed
• 40. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent. 2002;30: 371-382.ArticlePubMed
• 41. Choi SM, Park SH, Choi KK, Park SJ. Effect of the additional application of a resin layer on dentin bonding using single-step adhesives. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2007;32: 313-326.Article
• 42. Kim DW, Park SJ, Choi KK. Compatibility of self-etching dentin adhesives with resin luting cements. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2005;30: 493-504.Article
• 43. Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Degree of conversion of dual-cure luting resins light-polymerized through various materials. Acta Odontol Scand. 2007;65: 201-205.ArticlePubMed
• 44. Kumbuloglu O, Lassila LV, User A, Vallittu PK. A study of the physical and chemical properties of four resin composite luting cements. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17: 357-363.PubMed
• 45. De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater. 2004;20: 963-971.ArticlePubMed
• 46. Yang B, Ludwig K, Adelung R, Kern M. Micro- tensile bond strength of three luting resins to human regional dentin. Dent Mater. 2006;22: 45-56.ArticlePubMed
• 47. Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and contraction stress of dental resin composites. Dent Mater. 2005;21: 1150-1157.ArticlePubMed

Figure 1

Schematic presentation of µTBS test.

Figure 2

FE-SEM images of resin cement/dentin interface (×1000). Composite-based resin cements(a, b) showed adhesive layer, uniform hybrid layer and well developed resin tags. Adhesive-based resin cements(c, d) showed uncertain hybrid layer and slender resin tags (CO: Composite overlay, RC: Resin cement, AD: Adhesive layer, HL: Hybrid layer, D: Dentin).

Figure 3

FE-SEM images of debonded interface (×1000). Composite-based resin cements(a, b) showed mixed failure at top and bottom of hybrid layer. Opened dentinal tubules, resin cement and adhesive layer could be seen. Adhesive-based resin cements(c, d) showed adhesive failure at hybrid layer. Partially opened dentinal tubules and void formation could be seen (RC: Resin cement, AD: Adhesive layer, DT: Dentinal tubule, HL: Hybrid layer).

Table 1

Resin cements used in this study

Table 2

Adhesive system of resin cements used in this study

Table 3

Two-way ANOVA result between factors of resin cements and film thickness

Table 4

Microtensile bond strengths for experimental groups (MPa ± SD)

Groups with the same superscripts letters indicate no significant difference (p > 0.05), according to resin cements (small letters) or film thickness (capital letters).

Table 5

Polymerization shrinkage, flexural strength and flexural modulus of resin cements

Mean values for each test with same subscript were not significantly different (p > 0.05)

Tables & Figures

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  

• Full mapping tensile bond strength of luting in search for differences due to centripetal curing shrinkage
  José C. de la Macorra, Beatriz Romero
  Dental Materials.2022; 38(4): e69.     CrossRef