Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 27(6); 2002 > Article
  • rupiahtoto
  • rupiahtoto
  • rupiahtoto
  • rupiahtoto
  • rupiahtoto
  • rupiahtoto
  • slot deposit pulsa
  • bo slot gacor
  • toto togel
  • slot gacor
  • login rupiahtoto
  • rupiahtoto
  • rupiahtoto
  • rupiahtoto
  • rupiahtoto
  • Original Article Shear bond strength of repaired composite resin restorations
    Soo-young Choi, Sun-Wa Jeong*, Yun-Chan Hwang, Sun-Ho Kim, Chang Yun, Won-Mann Oh, In-Nam Hwang
    2002;27(6):-576.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.6.569
    Published online: November 30, 2002

    Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, DSRI, Chonnam National University, Korea.

    *Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Seonam University, Korea.

    Copyright © 2002 Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry

    • 354 Views
    • 0 Download
    • 2 Crossref
    prev next
    • This study was performed to evaluate the interfacial shear bond strength of base (direct and indirect) and repair composites with aging and surface treatment methods.
      Direct composite resin specimens (Charisma®, Heraeus Kulzer, Germany) were aged for 5 min, 1 hour, 24 hours, and 1 week in 37℃ distilled water before surface treatment, and then divided into five groups: Group 1, grinding; Group 2, grinding and application of bonding agent; Group 3, grinding, etching with 37% phosphoric acid for 30sec, and application of bonding agent; Group 4, grinding, etching with 37% phosphoric acid for 30sec, silane treatment, and application of bonding agent; Group 5, grinding, etching with 4% hydrofluoric acid for 30sec, silane treatment, and application of bonding agent.
      Indirect composite resin specimens (Artglass®, Heraeus Kulzer, Germany) were aged for 1 week in 37℃ distilled water and divided into seven groups: Group 1 - Group 5, equal to Charisma specimens; Group 6, grinding, etching with 37% phosphoric acid for 60sec, silane treatment, and application of bonding agent; Group7, grinding, etching with 4% hydrofluoric acid for 60 sec, silane treatment, and application of bonding agent.
      The repair material(Charisma®) was then added on the center of the surface (5 mm in diameter, 5 mm in height). The shear bond strength was tested and the data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and the Student-Newman-Keuls test.
      The following conclusions were drawn.
      1. The shear bond strength of Charisma® specimens aged for 1 hour was significantly higher in Group 2 and Group 5 than in Group 1 (p<0.05), and that of Charisma® specimens aged for 1 week was significantly higher in Group 3 and Group 5 than in Group 1 (p<0.05). No significant difference was found in the bond strength of specimens aged for 5 min and 24 hours.
      2. In Group 2 of the Charisma® specimens, there was significant difference between the bond strength of 24 hours and that of 1 week (p<0.05).
      3. In Group 4 of the Charisma® specimens, the shear bond strength of specimens aged for 24 hours was significantly higher than the others(p<0.05).
      4. There was no significant difference between the shear bond strength of the Artglass® specimens.
      5. Most of the Charisma® specimens showed cohesive fractures. Artglass® specimens that were etched with acid (phosphoric or hydrofluoric) for 30 sec showed more cohesive fractures.
    Fig. 1
    The shear bond strength of Charism® specimens aged for 5 min.
    jkacd-27-569-g001.jpg
    Fig. 2
    The shear bond strength of Charisma® specimens aged for 1 hr.
    jkacd-27-569-g002.jpg
    Fig. 3
    The shear bond strength of Charisma® specimens aged for 24 hrs.
    jkacd-27-569-g003.jpg
    Fig. 4
    The shear bond strength of Charisma® specimens aged for 1 wk.
    jkacd-27-569-g004.jpg
    Fig. 5
    The shear bond strength of Artglass® specimens.
    jkacd-27-569-g005.jpg
    Fig. 6
    Comparison of the shear bond strength of Charisma® specimens.
    jkacd-27-569-g006.jpg
    Table 1
    The shear bond strength (MPa) of composite resin. (mean±S.D., n=5)
    jkacd-27-569-i001.jpg
    Table 2-1
    Failure mode of Charisma® specimens.
    jkacd-27-569-i002.jpg
    Table 2-2
    Failure mode of Artglass® specimens.
    jkacd-27-569-i003.jpg
    • 1. Chan DCN, Lemake KC, Howell ML, Barghi N. The effect of microabrasion on restorative materials and tooth surface. Oper Dent. 1996;21: 63-68.PubMed
    • 2. Shahdad SA, Kennedy JG. Bond strength of repaired anterior composite resins: an in vitro study. J Dent. 1997;26: 685-694.
    • 3. Lewis G, Johnson W, Martin W, Canerdy A, Claburn C, Collier M. Shear bond strength of immediately repaired light-cured composite resin restorations. Oper Dent. 1998;23: 121-127.PubMed
    • 4. Miranda FJ, Duncanson MG, Dilts WE. Interfacial bonding strengths of paired composite systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;51: 29-32.ArticlePubMed
    • 5. Davis BR, Millar BJ, Wood DJ, Budd NL. Strength of secondary-cured resin composite inlay repairs. Quintessence Int. 1997;28: 415-419.PubMed
    • 6. Kang HS, Choi HY. A Study on the Bond Strength of Repair Resin to the Surface Treated Composite Resins. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 1995;20: 487-507.
    • 7. Boyer DB, Chan KC, Reinhardt JW. Build-up and repair of light-cured composites: bond strength. J Dent Res. 1984;63: 1241-1244.ArticlePubMedPDF
    • 8. Vankerckhoven H, Lambrechts P, Van Beylen M, Davidson CL, Vanherle G. Unreacted methacrylate groups on the surfaces of composite resins. J Dent Res. 1982;61: 791-795.ArticlePubMedPDF
    • 9. Lloyd CH, Baigrie DA, Jeffrey IW. The tensile strength of composite repairs. J Dent. 1980;8: 171-177.ArticlePubMed
    • 10. Forsten L, Valiaho ML. Transverse and bond strengths of restorative resins. Acta Odontol Scand. 1971;29: 527-537.PubMed
    • 11. Reisbick MH, Brodsky BA. Strength parameters of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1971;26: 178-185.ArticlePubMed
    • 12. Boyer DB, Chan KC, Torney DL. The strength of multilayer and repaired composite resin. J Prosthet Dent. 1978;39: 63-67.ArticlePubMed
    • 13. Chiba K, Hosoda H, Fusayama T. The addition of an adhesive composite resin to the same material: bond strength and clinical techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61: 669-675.PubMed
    • 14. Turner CW, Meiers JC. Repair of an aged, contaminated indirect composite resin with a direct, visible light-cured composite resin. Oper Dent. 1993;18: 187-194.PubMed
    • 15. Brosh T, Pilo R, Bichacho N, Blutstein R. Effect of combination of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77: 122-126.PubMed
    • 16. Puckett AD, Holder R, O'Hara JW. Strength of posterior composite repairs using different composite/bonding agent combinations. Oper Dent. 1991;16: 136-140.PubMed
    • 17. Swift EJ Jr, LeValley BD, Boyer DB. Evaluation of new methods for composite repair. Dent Mater. 1992;8: 362-365.PubMed
    • 18. Soderholm KJ, Roberts MJ. Variables influencing the repair strength of dental composites. Scand J Dent Res. 1991;99: 173-180.ArticlePubMed
    • 19. Swift EJ, Wilder AD, May KN, Waddell SL. Shear bond strengths of one-bottle dentin adhesives using multiple applications. Oper Dent. 1997;22: 194-199.PubMed
    • 20. Barkmeier WW, Erickson RL. Shear bond strength of composite to enamel and dentin using Scotchbond Multi-Purpose. Am J Dent. 1994;7: 175-179.PubMed
    • 21. Gwinnett AJ, Yu S. Shear bond strength, microleakage and gap formation with fourth generation dentin bonding agents. Am J Dent. 1994;7: 312-314.
    • 22. Kanca J III. Resin bonding to wet substrate. I. Bonding to dentin. Quintessence Int. 1991;23: 39-41.
    • 23. Crumpler DC, Bayne SC, Sockwell S, Brunson D, Roberson TM. Bonding to resurfaced posterior composites. Dent Mater. 1989;5: 417-424.ArticlePubMed
    • 24. Pounder B, Gregory WA, Powers JM. Bond strenths of repaired composite resins. Oper Dent. 1987;12: 127-131.PubMed
    • 25. Eli I, Liberman R, Levi N, Haspel Y. Bond strength of joined posterior light-cured composites: comparison of surface treatments. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;60: 185-189.ArticlePubMed
    • 26. Eliades GC, Caputo AA. The strength of layering technique in visible light-cured composites. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61: 31-38.ArticlePubMed
    • 27. Azarbal P, Boyer DB, Chan KC. The effect of bonding agents on the interfacial bond strength of repaired composites. Dent Mater. 1986;2: 153-155.ArticlePubMed
    • 28. Saunders WP. Effect of fatigue upon the interfacial bond strength of repaired composite resins. J Dent. 1990;18: 158-162.ArticlePubMed
    • 29. Bouschlicher MR, Reinhardt JW, Vargas MA. Surface treatment techniques for resin composite repair. Am J Dent. 1997;10: 279-283.PubMed
    • 30. Matsumura H, Hisamatsu N, Atsuta M. Effect of unfilled resins and a silane primer on bonding between layers of a light-activated composite resin veneering material. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73: 386-391.ArticlePubMed
    • 31. Kula K, Nelson S, Thompson V. In vitro effect of APF gel on three composite resins. J Dent Res. 1983;62: 846-849.ArticlePubMedPDF
    • 32. Kula K, Nelson S, Kula T, Thompson V. In vitro effect of acidulated phosphate fluoride gel on the surface of composites with different filler particles. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;56: 161-169.ArticlePubMed
    • 33. Aschheim KW, Dale BG. Composite resin: indirect technique restorations. Esthetic Dentistry. 2001;2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby Co.; 97-111.

    Tables & Figures

    Fig. 1
    The shear bond strength of Charism® specimens aged for 5 min.
    jkacd-27-569-g001.jpg
    Fig. 2
    The shear bond strength of Charisma® specimens aged for 1 hr.
    jkacd-27-569-g002.jpg
    Fig. 3
    The shear bond strength of Charisma® specimens aged for 24 hrs.
    jkacd-27-569-g003.jpg
    Fig. 4
    The shear bond strength of Charisma® specimens aged for 1 wk.
    jkacd-27-569-g004.jpg
    Fig. 5
    The shear bond strength of Artglass® specimens.
    jkacd-27-569-g005.jpg
    Fig. 6
    Comparison of the shear bond strength of Charisma® specimens.
    jkacd-27-569-g006.jpg
    Table 1
    The shear bond strength (MPa) of composite resin. (mean±S.D., n=5)
    jkacd-27-569-i001.jpg
    Table 2-1
    Failure mode of Charisma® specimens.
    jkacd-27-569-i002.jpg
    Table 2-2
    Failure mode of Artglass® specimens.
    jkacd-27-569-i003.jpg

    REFERENCES

    • 1. Chan DCN, Lemake KC, Howell ML, Barghi N. The effect of microabrasion on restorative materials and tooth surface. Oper Dent. 1996;21: 63-68.PubMed
    • 2. Shahdad SA, Kennedy JG. Bond strength of repaired anterior composite resins: an in vitro study. J Dent. 1997;26: 685-694.
    • 3. Lewis G, Johnson W, Martin W, Canerdy A, Claburn C, Collier M. Shear bond strength of immediately repaired light-cured composite resin restorations. Oper Dent. 1998;23: 121-127.PubMed
    • 4. Miranda FJ, Duncanson MG, Dilts WE. Interfacial bonding strengths of paired composite systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;51: 29-32.ArticlePubMed
    • 5. Davis BR, Millar BJ, Wood DJ, Budd NL. Strength of secondary-cured resin composite inlay repairs. Quintessence Int. 1997;28: 415-419.PubMed
    • 6. Kang HS, Choi HY. A Study on the Bond Strength of Repair Resin to the Surface Treated Composite Resins. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 1995;20: 487-507.
    • 7. Boyer DB, Chan KC, Reinhardt JW. Build-up and repair of light-cured composites: bond strength. J Dent Res. 1984;63: 1241-1244.ArticlePubMedPDF
    • 8. Vankerckhoven H, Lambrechts P, Van Beylen M, Davidson CL, Vanherle G. Unreacted methacrylate groups on the surfaces of composite resins. J Dent Res. 1982;61: 791-795.ArticlePubMedPDF
    • 9. Lloyd CH, Baigrie DA, Jeffrey IW. The tensile strength of composite repairs. J Dent. 1980;8: 171-177.ArticlePubMed
    • 10. Forsten L, Valiaho ML. Transverse and bond strengths of restorative resins. Acta Odontol Scand. 1971;29: 527-537.PubMed
    • 11. Reisbick MH, Brodsky BA. Strength parameters of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1971;26: 178-185.ArticlePubMed
    • 12. Boyer DB, Chan KC, Torney DL. The strength of multilayer and repaired composite resin. J Prosthet Dent. 1978;39: 63-67.ArticlePubMed
    • 13. Chiba K, Hosoda H, Fusayama T. The addition of an adhesive composite resin to the same material: bond strength and clinical techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61: 669-675.PubMed
    • 14. Turner CW, Meiers JC. Repair of an aged, contaminated indirect composite resin with a direct, visible light-cured composite resin. Oper Dent. 1993;18: 187-194.PubMed
    • 15. Brosh T, Pilo R, Bichacho N, Blutstein R. Effect of combination of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77: 122-126.PubMed
    • 16. Puckett AD, Holder R, O'Hara JW. Strength of posterior composite repairs using different composite/bonding agent combinations. Oper Dent. 1991;16: 136-140.PubMed
    • 17. Swift EJ Jr, LeValley BD, Boyer DB. Evaluation of new methods for composite repair. Dent Mater. 1992;8: 362-365.PubMed
    • 18. Soderholm KJ, Roberts MJ. Variables influencing the repair strength of dental composites. Scand J Dent Res. 1991;99: 173-180.ArticlePubMed
    • 19. Swift EJ, Wilder AD, May KN, Waddell SL. Shear bond strengths of one-bottle dentin adhesives using multiple applications. Oper Dent. 1997;22: 194-199.PubMed
    • 20. Barkmeier WW, Erickson RL. Shear bond strength of composite to enamel and dentin using Scotchbond Multi-Purpose. Am J Dent. 1994;7: 175-179.PubMed
    • 21. Gwinnett AJ, Yu S. Shear bond strength, microleakage and gap formation with fourth generation dentin bonding agents. Am J Dent. 1994;7: 312-314.
    • 22. Kanca J III. Resin bonding to wet substrate. I. Bonding to dentin. Quintessence Int. 1991;23: 39-41.
    • 23. Crumpler DC, Bayne SC, Sockwell S, Brunson D, Roberson TM. Bonding to resurfaced posterior composites. Dent Mater. 1989;5: 417-424.ArticlePubMed
    • 24. Pounder B, Gregory WA, Powers JM. Bond strenths of repaired composite resins. Oper Dent. 1987;12: 127-131.PubMed
    • 25. Eli I, Liberman R, Levi N, Haspel Y. Bond strength of joined posterior light-cured composites: comparison of surface treatments. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;60: 185-189.ArticlePubMed
    • 26. Eliades GC, Caputo AA. The strength of layering technique in visible light-cured composites. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61: 31-38.ArticlePubMed
    • 27. Azarbal P, Boyer DB, Chan KC. The effect of bonding agents on the interfacial bond strength of repaired composites. Dent Mater. 1986;2: 153-155.ArticlePubMed
    • 28. Saunders WP. Effect of fatigue upon the interfacial bond strength of repaired composite resins. J Dent. 1990;18: 158-162.ArticlePubMed
    • 29. Bouschlicher MR, Reinhardt JW, Vargas MA. Surface treatment techniques for resin composite repair. Am J Dent. 1997;10: 279-283.PubMed
    • 30. Matsumura H, Hisamatsu N, Atsuta M. Effect of unfilled resins and a silane primer on bonding between layers of a light-activated composite resin veneering material. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73: 386-391.ArticlePubMed
    • 31. Kula K, Nelson S, Thompson V. In vitro effect of APF gel on three composite resins. J Dent Res. 1983;62: 846-849.ArticlePubMedPDF
    • 32. Kula K, Nelson S, Kula T, Thompson V. In vitro effect of acidulated phosphate fluoride gel on the surface of composites with different filler particles. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;56: 161-169.ArticlePubMed
    • 33. Aschheim KW, Dale BG. Composite resin: indirect technique restorations. Esthetic Dentistry. 2001;2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby Co.; 97-111.

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Analysis of the 2-dimensional marginal fit of the occlusal surface and the 3-dimensional accuracy of the inner surface of the occlusal surface according to the inlay prosthesis structure made of composite resin
      Kim Dong-Yeon, Lee Tae-Hee, Park Dong-In, Park Jin-Young, Jeong Il-Do, Lee Ha-Na, Kim Ji-Hwan, Kim Woong-Chul
      Journal of Korean Acedemy of Dental Technology.2019; 41(1): 21.     CrossRef
    • The study of fractural behavior of repaired composite
      Sang-Soon Park, Wook Nam, Ah-Hyang Eom, Duck-Su Kim, Gi-Woon Choi, Kyoung-Kyu Choi
      Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2010; 35(6): 461.     CrossRef
    CanvasJS.com
    CanvasJS.com
    CanvasJS.com

    • ePub LinkePub Link
    • Cite
      CITE
      export Copy Download
      Close
      Download Citation
      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:
      • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
      • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
      Include:
      • Citation for the content below
      Shear bond strength of repaired composite resin restorations
      J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2002;27(6):569-576.   Published online November 30, 2002
      Close
    • XML DownloadXML Download
    Figure
    • 1
    Shear bond strength of repaired composite resin restorations
    Image Image Image Image Image Image
    Fig. 1 The shear bond strength of Charism® specimens aged for 5 min.
    Fig. 2 The shear bond strength of Charisma® specimens aged for 1 hr.
    Fig. 3 The shear bond strength of Charisma® specimens aged for 24 hrs.
    Fig. 4 The shear bond strength of Charisma® specimens aged for 1 wk.
    Fig. 5 The shear bond strength of Artglass® specimens.
    Fig. 6 Comparison of the shear bond strength of Charisma® specimens.
    Shear bond strength of repaired composite resin restorations

    The shear bond strength (MPa) of composite resin. (mean±S.D., n=5)

    Failure mode of Charisma® specimens.

    Failure mode of Artglass® specimens.

    Table 1 The shear bond strength (MPa) of composite resin. (mean±S.D., n=5)

    Table 2-1 Failure mode of Charisma® specimens.

    Table 2-2 Failure mode of Artglass® specimens.


    Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
    Close layer
    TOP Mpgyi