Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 37(4); 2012 > Article
  • rupiahtoto
  • rupiahtoto
  • rupiahtoto
  • rupiahtoto
  • rupiahtoto
  • rupiahtoto
  • slot deposit pulsa
  • bo slot gacor
  • toto togel
  • slot gacor
  • login rupiahtoto
  • rupiahtoto
  • rupiahtoto
  • rupiahtoto
  • rupiahtoto
  • Open Lecture on Statistics Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (1)
    Hae-Young Kim
    2012;37(4):-248.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2012.37.4.245
    Published online: November 21, 2012

    Department of Dental Laboratory Science & Engineering, Korea University College of Health Science, Seoul, Korea.

    Correspondence to Hae-Young Kim, PhD, DDS. Associate Professor, Department of Dental Laboratory Science & Engineering, Korea University College of Health Science, San 1 Jeongneung 3-dong, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Korea 136-703. TEL, +82-2-940-2845; FAX, +82-2-909-3502; kimhaey@korea.ac.kr

    ©Copyights 2012. The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.

    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    • 1,017 Views
    • 26 Download
    • 28 Crossref
    prev next
    Various parametric tests make assumptions of the normal distribution, including t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), correlation, and regression. Different from some researcher's understanding, tests of normality are not for the normality of observed data but for normality of the population distribution of a random characteristic; e.g. assuming normality for the population distribution of the characteristic is reasonable when referring to the observed sample data. Actual distribution of the characteristic in a random sample chosen from a population with normal distribution doesn't appear normal, especially when the sample size is small (Figure 1). Distributions of larger samples tend to resemble the distribution of the characteristic in the population better by taking on a bell-shaped curve when the values of a characteristic in the population are plotted against their frequency.
    rde-37-245-g001.jpg Figure 1 
    Histograms of a characteristic of interest in various sizes of random samples from a normal population (N = 10,000) with a normal distribution (sample size = 3, 5, 10, 30, 100 and 500).
    Download Figure Download Figure
    Using the SPSS output you can find out several methods to test normality of the data.
    In SPSS you can find information needed for normality tests under the following menu:
    Analysis - Descriptive Statistics - Explore
    (1) Eyeball test
    • You can look at a histogram of your data and see whether the distribution of the sample resembles a normal distribution or not; e.g., whether the histogram looks like a bell-shape or not? Is the shape symmetrical or not? Or you can chose a Q-Q ("Q" stands for quantile) plot to see whether all the data points have a linear tendency and lie on the diagonal or not.

    • Most statistical packages provide both types of graphs. The advantage of the eyeball test is its easiness and simplicity and the disadvantage is that the criteria for determination are not clear.

    • Furthermore confusion arises from the fact that samples from a normal population don't necessarily show a normal distribution; few samples look like normal distributions, especially samples with small size, as we can see in Figure 1. Therefore this eyeball test may be more meaningful in relatively large samples (e.g., n > 50).

    (2) Shapiro-Wilk test & Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
    • Generally formal normality tests such as the Shapiro-Wilk test or the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test have been well known. Those tests assess a null hypothesis that distribution of the data is normal. The Shapiro-Wilk test has been reported to be more powerful than the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test in testing normality (Razali et al., 2011).

    There are problems in formal normality tests that the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis of normality tends to slightly increase as sample size increases: for large samples (n > 300), these formal normality tests may be unreliable. Following example shows incompatible results in normality test for a large sample (n = 500). While the data seems to be approximately normal by an eyeball test, the Shapiro-Wilk test and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test give an opposite conclusion that the distribution of the data may be different from normality (p < 0.05).
    Though methods above provide useful information, still it is not easy to determine whether the example data may satisfy the assumption of normal distribution or not. Confusion may arise because they suggest incompatible conclusions as shown above. More helpful methods to determine normality can be discussed at the next statistical note.
    • 1. Razali NM, Wah YB. Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anserson-Darling tests. J Stat Model Anal 2011;22:21-33.

    Tables & Figures

    rde-37-245-g001.jpg Figure 1 
    Histograms of a characteristic of interest in various sizes of random samples from a normal population (N = 10,000) with a normal distribution (sample size = 3, 5, 10, 30, 100 and 500).
    Download Figure Download Figure

    REFERENCES

    • 1. Razali NM, Wah YB. Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anserson-Darling tests. J Stat Model Anal 2011;22:21-33.

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Reliability and Validity Measures of the Patellofemoral Subscale KOOS-PF in Greek Patients with Patellofemoral Pain
      Ioannis Moros, Eleni C. Boutsikari, George Plakoutsis, Elefterios Paraskevopoulos, George A. Koumantakis, Maria Papandreou
      Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology.2025; 10(1): 44.     CrossRef
    • Relationships between nurses’ perceived social support, emotional labor, presenteeism, and psychiatric distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study
      Hossein Ebrahimi, Farnaz Rahmani, Khadijeh Ghorbani
      BMC Psychology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • The roles of social support, family support, coping strategies, and financial safety in posttraumatic growth among COVID-19 survivors in Kerala
      Lijo Kochakadan Joy, Lincy Eralil Kunjumon, Anirudh Anil, Malavika Jaisankar, Aysha Fariha, Naziya Zaina Naufal, Swetha Pulikkal Santhosh, Anagha Kallazhi, Chee-Seng Tan
      Current Psychology.2024; 43(19): 17766.     CrossRef
    • The Gothenburg Trismus Questionnaire in China: Cross‐cultural adaptation and measurement invariance
      Qian Zhang, Yao Feng, Ying‐Hui Zhou, Yi‐Fan Yang, Yun‐Zhi Feng, Yue Guo
      Head & Neck.2024; 46(7): 1706.     CrossRef
    • Shared benefits and sustainable mobility – A case of autonomous bus
      Kari Koskinen, Niina Mallat, Bikesh Raj Upreti
      Case Studies on Transport Policy.2024; 18: 101286.     CrossRef
    • Comparison of perceived masticatory ability in completely edentulous patients treated with thermoplastic complete denture versus single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: a single-center prospective observational study
      Mostafa I. Fayad, Ihab I. Mahmoud, Ahmed Atef Aly Shon, Mohamed Omar Elboraey, Ramy M. Bakr, Rania Moussa
      PeerJ.2024; 12: e17670.     CrossRef
    • The predictors of COVID-19 preventive health behaviors among adolescents: the role of health belief model and health literacy
      Parvaneh Vasli, Zahra Shekarian-Asl, Mina Zarmehrparirouy, Meimanat Hosseini
      Journal of Public Health.2024; 32(1): 157.     CrossRef
    • A randomized controlled trial on the effects of traditional Thai mind-body exercise (Ruesi Dadton) on biomarkers in mild cognitive impairment
      Phaksachiphon KHANTHONG, Kusuma SRIYAKUL, Ananya DECHAKHAMPHU, Aungkana KRAJARNG, Chuntida KAMALASHIRAN, Vadhana JAYATHAVAJ, Parunkul TUNGSUKRUTHAI
      European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Fighting Emerging Caspofungin-Resistant Candida Species: Mitigating Fks1-Mediated Resistance and Enhancing Caspofungin Efficacy by Chitosan
      Aya Tarek, Yasmine H. Tartor, Mohamed N. Hassan, Ioan Pet, Mirela Ahmadi, Adel Abdelkhalek
      Antibiotics.2024; 13(7): 578.     CrossRef
    • Influence of Intraoperative Active and Passive Breaks in Simulated Minimally Invasive Procedures on Surgeons’ Perceived Discomfort, Performance, and Workload
      Rosina Bonsch, Robert Seibt, Bernhard Krämer, Monika A. Rieger, Benjamin Steinhilber, Tessy Luger
      Life.2024; 14(4): 426.     CrossRef
    • Stay at home behavior during COVID-19: The role of person-home relationships
      Silvia Ariccio, Annalisa Theodorou
      Journal of Environmental Psychology.2024; 97: 102334.     CrossRef
    • The impact of psychological distress, socio‐demographic and work‐related factors on coping strategies used by nurses during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A cross‐sectional study
      Farnaz Rahmani, Fatemeh Ranjbar, Elnaz Asghari, Leila Gholizadeh
      Nursing Open.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • A study protocol for a single-centred randomized trial to investigate the effect of pre-treatment communication methods on dental anxiety among adult dental patients
      Shakeerah Olaide Gbadebo, Gbemisola Aderemi Oke, Oluwole Oyekunle Dosumu
      SAGE Open Medicine.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Development, validation and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the biopsychosocial impact scale in orofacial pain patients
      Ze-Yue Ou-Yang, Yao Feng, Dong-Dong Xie, Yi-Fan Yang, Yun Chen, Ning-Xin Chen, Xiao-Lin Su, Bi-Fen Kuang, Jie Zhao, Ya-Qiong Zhao, Yun-Zhi Feng, Yue Guo
      Frontiers in Psychology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Using a Back Exoskeleton During Industrial and Functional Tasks—Effects on Muscle Activity, Posture, Performance, Usability, and Wearer Discomfort in a Laboratory Trial
      Tessy Luger, Mona Bär, Robert Seibt, Monika A. Rieger, Benjamin Steinhilber
      Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.2023; 65(1): 5.     CrossRef
    • Impact of door in-door out time on total ischemia time and clinical outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction
      Cátia Costa Oliveira, Miguel Afonso, Carlos Braga, João Costa, Jorge Marques
      Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia.2023; 42(2): 101.     CrossRef
    • Measuring the service quality of governmental sites: Development and validation of the e-Government service quality (EGSQUAL) scale
      Muhammad Aljukhadar, Jean-François Belisle, Danilo C. Dantas, Sylvain Sénécal, Ryad Titah
      Electronic Commerce Research and Applications.2022; 55: 101182.     CrossRef
    • Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Disposition Levels of Computational Thinking Instrument Among Secondary School Students
      Saralah Sovey, Kamisah Osman, Mohd Effendi Ewan Mohd-Matore
      European Journal of Educational Research.2022; volume-11-(volume-11-): 639.     CrossRef
    • The Development and Psychometric Assessment of Malaysian Youth Adversity Quotient Instrument (MY-AQi) by Combining Rasch Model and Confirmatory Factor Analysis
      Mohd Effendi Ewan Mohd Matore, Mohammed Afandi Zainal, Muhamad Firdaus Mohd Noh, Ahmad Zamri Khairani, Nordin Abd Razak
      IEEE Access.2021; 9: 13314.     CrossRef
    • Enhancing celebrity fan-destination relationship in film-induced tourism: The effect of authenticity
      Hsiu-Yu Teng, Chien-Yu Chen
      Tourism Management Perspectives.2020; 33: 100605.     CrossRef
    • Sex differences in muscle activity and motor variability in response to a non-fatiguing repetitive screwing task
      Tessy Luger, Robert Seibt, Monika A. Rieger, Benjamin Steinhilber
      Biology of Sex Differences.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Physiological changes during prolonged standing and walking considering age, gender and standing work experience
      Rudolf Wall, Gabriela Garcia, Thomas Läubli, Robert Seibt, Monika A. Rieger, Bernard Martin, Benjamin Steinhilber
      Ergonomics.2020; 63(5): 579.     CrossRef
    • Is the Arrhenius-correction of biodegradation rates, as recommended through REACH guidance, fit for environmentally relevant conditions? An example from petroleum biodegradation in environmental systems
      David M. Brown, Louise Camenzuli, Aaron D. Redman, Chris Hughes, Neil Wang, Eleni Vaiopoulou, David Saunders, Alex Villalobos, Susannah Linington
      Science of The Total Environment.2020; 732: 139293.     CrossRef
    • The Role of Motor Learning on Measures of Physical Requirements and Motor Variability During Repetitive Screwing
      Tessy Luger, Robert Seibt, Monika A. Rieger, Benjamin Steinhilber
      International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2019; 16(7): 1231.     CrossRef
    • Influence of a passive lower-limb exoskeleton during simulated industrial work tasks on physical load, upper body posture, postural control and discomfort
      Tessy Luger, Robert Seibt, Timothy J. Cobb, Monika A. Rieger, Benjamin Steinhilber
      Applied Ergonomics.2019; 80: 152.     CrossRef
    • Efficacy of Epithelium-Off and Epithelium-On Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in Pediatric Keratoconus
      Muhsin Eraslan, Ebru Toker, Eren Cerman, Deniz Ozarslan
      Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice.2017; 43(3): 155.     CrossRef
    • Failure to Replicate the Structure of a Spanish-Language Brief Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives Across Three Samples of Latino Smokers
      Yessenia Castro, Virmarie Correa-Fernández, Miguel Á. Cano, Carlos Mazas, Karla Gonzalez, Damon J. Vidrine, Jennifer I. Vidrine, David W. Wetter
      Nicotine & Tobacco Research.2014; 16(9): 1277.     CrossRef
    • A cross-lagged path analysis of five intrapersonal determinants of smoking cessation
      Yessenia Castro, Miguel Ángel Cano, Michael S. Businelle, Virmarie Correa-Fernández, Whitney L. Heppner, Carlos A. Mazas, David W. Wetter
      Drug and Alcohol Dependence.2014; 137: 98.     CrossRef
    CanvasJS.com
    CanvasJS.com
    CanvasJS.com

    • ePub LinkePub Link
    • Cite
      CITE
      export Copy Download
      Close
      Download Citation
      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:
      • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
      • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
      Include:
      • Citation for the content below
      Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (1)
      Restor Dent Endod. 2012;37(4):245-248.   Published online November 21, 2012
      Close
    • XML DownloadXML Download
    Figure
    • 0
    Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (1)
    Image
    Figure 1 Histograms of a characteristic of interest in various sizes of random samples from a normal population (N = 10,000) with a normal distribution (sample size = 3, 5, 10, 30, 100 and 500).
    Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (1)

    Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
    Close layer
    TOP Mpgyi