Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  

• Eco-conscious synthesis of novel 1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine derivatives as potent Anti-microbial agent and comparative study of cell viability and cytotoxicity in HEK-293 cell line utilizing Indian gooseberry (Phyllanthus emblica) fruit extract
  Bhaktiben R. Bhatt, Kamalkishor Pandey, Tarosh Patel, Anupama Modi, Chandani Halpani, Vaibhav D. Bhatt, Bharat C. Dixit
  Bioorganic Chemistry.2024; 153: 107936.     CrossRef
• Cell mediated ECM-degradation as an emerging tool for anti-fibrotic strategy
  Peng Zhao, Tian Sun, Cheng Lyu, Kaini Liang, Yanan Du
  Cell Regeneration.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Insight into the development of versatile dentin bonding agents to increase the durability of the bonding interface
  Isabel Cristina Celerino de Moraes Porto, Teresa de Lisieux Guedes Ferreira Lôbo, Raphaela Farias Rodrigues, Rodrigo Barros Esteves Lins, Marcos Aurélio Bomfim da Silva
  Frontiers in Dental Medicine.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  

• An in vitro comparative evaluation of silver and chitosan nanoparticles on shear bond strength of nanohybrid composite using different adhesion protocols
  Roopadevi Garlapati, Nagesh Bolla, Mayana Aameena Banu, Anila Bandlapally Sreenivasa Guptha, Niharika Halder, Ram Chowdary Basam
  Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics.2025; 28(6): 522.     CrossRef
• The Effect of Silver Nanoparticles on Bond Strength of Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer: An In Vitro Study
  Sundus Bukhary, Sarah Alkahtany, Dalal AlDabeeb
  Applied Sciences.2024; 14(21): 9817.     CrossRef
• Performance of self-etching adhesives on caries-affected primary dentin treated with glutaraldehyde or silver diamine fluoride
  Marcelly Tupan Christoffoli Wolowski, Andressa Mioto Stabile Grenier, Victória Alícia de Oliveira, Caroline Anselmi, Mariana Sversut Gibin, Lidiane Vizioli de Castro-Hoshino, Francielle Sato, Cristina Perez, Régis Henke Scheffel, Josimeri Hebling, Mauro L
  Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials.2024; 150: 106293.     CrossRef
• The Impact of Silver Nanoparticles on Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Endodontic Bioceramic Sealer
  Sundus Bukhary, Sarah Alkahtany, Amal Almohaimede, Nourah Alkhayatt, Shahad Alsulaiman, Salma Alohali
  Applied Sciences.2024; 14(24): 11639.     CrossRef
• Effect of silver diamine fluoride on the longevity of the bonding properties to caries-affected dentine
  LP Muniz, M Wendlinger, GD Cochinski, PHA Moreira, AFM Cardenas, TS Carvalho, AD Loguercio, A Reis, FSF Siqueira
  Journal of Dentistry.2024; 143: 104897.     CrossRef
• Evaluation of Chitosan-Oleuropein Nanoparticles on the Durability of Dentin Bonding
  Shuya Zhao, Yunyang Zhang, Yun Chen, Xianghui Xing, Yu Wang, Guofeng Wu
  Drug Design, Development and Therapy.2023; Volume 17: 167.     CrossRef
• Influence of silver nanoparticles on the resin-dentin bond strength and antibacterial activity of a self-etch adhesive system
  Jia Wang, Wei Jiang, Jingping Liang, Shujun Ran
  The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.2022; 128(6): 1363.e1.     CrossRef
• Marginal Integrity of Composite Restoration with and without Surface Pretreatment by Gold and Silver Nanoparticles vs Chlorhexidine: A Randomized Controlled Trial
  Aya AEM Nemt-Allah, Shereen H Ibrahim, Amira F El-Zoghby
  The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice.2022; 22(10): 1087.     CrossRef
• Effect of Cavity Disinfectants on Dentin Bond Strength and Clinical Success of Composite Restorations—A Systematic Review of In Vitro, In Situ and Clinical Studies
  Ana Coelho, Inês Amaro, Beatriz Rascão, Inês Marcelino, Anabela Paula, José Saraiva, Gianrico Spagnuolo, Manuel Marques Ferreira, Carlos Miguel Marto, Eunice Carrilho
  International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2020; 22(1): 353.     CrossRef

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  

• The influence of different factors on the bond strength of lithium disilicate-reinforced glass–ceramics to Resin: a machine learning analysis
  Jiawen Liu, Suqing Tu, Mingjuan Wang, Du Chen, Chen Chen, Haifeng Xie
  BMC Oral Health.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Influence of different primers and adhesive system combinations on the durability of resin bonding to lithium disilicate
  Christine Yazigi, Shila Alawi, Sebastian Wille, Matthias Kern
  The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Effect of universal adhesives and self-etch ceramic primers on bond strength to glass-ceramics: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies
  Renally Bezerra Wanderley Lima, Isis de Araújo Ferreira Muniz, Débora e Silva Campos, Fabián Murillo-Gómez, Ana Karina Maciel de Andrade, Rosângela Marques Duarte, Grace Mendonça de Souza
  The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.2024; 131(3): 392.     CrossRef
• Effect of the difference water amounts and hydrolysis times of silane coupling agent on the shear bond strength between lithium disilicate glass ceramic and composite resin
  Pimchanok OSOTPRASIT, Sasipin LAUVAHUTANON, Yosnarong SIRIMETHAWONG, Patcharanun CHAIAMORNSUP, Pornpot JIANGKONGKHO
  Dental Materials Journal.2024; 43(3): 375.     CrossRef
• Is additional silane application necessary for a new silane‐containing universal adhesive to bond to glass ceramics?
  Priscila Luciane da Silva, Hélio Radke Bittencourt, Luiz Henrique Burnett, Ana Maria Spohr
  Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry.2024; 36(10): 1452.     CrossRef
• The Effect of Various Lasers on the Bond Strength Between Orthodontic Brackets and Dental Ceramics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
  Seyed Ali Mosaddad, Jaafar Abduo, Mehrnaz Zakizade, Hamid Tebyaniyan, Ahmed Hussain
  Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery.2024; 42(1): 20.     CrossRef
• Long-Term Bonding Performance of One-Bottle vs. Two-Bottle Bonding Agents to Lithium Disilicate Ceramics
  Masao Irie, Masahiro Okada, Yukinori Maruo, Goro Nishigawa, Takuya Matsumoto
  Polymers.2024; 16(16): 2266.     CrossRef
• Bond strength to different CAD/CAM lithium disilicate reinforced ceramics
  Mona Alhomuod, Jin‐Ho Phark, Sillas Duarte
  Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry.2023; 35(1): 129.     CrossRef
• Surface Treatment Effect on Shear Bond Strength between Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramic and Resin Cement
  Siripan Simasetha, Awiruth Klaisiri, Tool Sriamporn, Kraisorn Sappayatosok, Niyom Thamrongananskul
  European Journal of Dentistry.2022; 16(02): 373.     CrossRef
• Bonding of Clear Aligner Composite Attachments to Ceramic Materials: An In Vitro Study
  Bashair A. Alsaud, Maher S. Hajjaj, Ahmad I. Masoud, Ensanya A. Abou Neel, Dalia A. Abuelenain, Amal I. Linjawi
  Materials.2022; 15(12): 4145.     CrossRef
• Bonding of different resin luting materials to composite, polymer-infiltrated and feldspathic ceramic CAD/CAM blocks
  Burcu Dikici, Esra Can Say
  Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology.2022; 36(14): 1572.     CrossRef
• Influence of mechanical and chemical pre-treatments on the repair of a hybrid ceramic
  Sascha Niklas Jung, Stefan Rüttermann
  Dental Materials.2022; 38(7): 1140.     CrossRef
• Effect of Silane-Containing Universal Adhesives on the Bonding Strength of Lithium Disilicate
  Yu-Ri Kim, Jae-Hoon Kim, Sung-Ae Son, Jeong-Kil Park
  Materials.2021; 14(14): 3976.     CrossRef
• Ceramics in dentistry: which material is appropriate for the anterior or posterior Dentition? Part 1: materials science
  Loo Chien Win, Peter Sands, Stephen J Bonsor, FJ Trevor Burke
  Dental Update.2021; 48(8): 680.     CrossRef
• The effect of different ceramic surface treatments on the repair bond strength of resin composite to lithium disilicate ceramic
  Nanako UEDA, Tomohiro TAKAGAKI, Toru NIKAIDO, Rena TAKAHASHI, Masaomi IKEDA, Junji TAGAMI
  Dental Materials Journal.2021; 40(5): 1073.     CrossRef
• Bonding Strength of Universal Adhesives to Indirect Substrates: A Meta‐Analysis of in Vitro Studies
  Carlos Enrique Cuevas‐Suárez, Wellington Luiz de Oliveira da Rosa, Rafael Pino Vitti, Adriana Fernandes da Silva, Evandro Piva
  Journal of Prosthodontics.2020; 29(4): 298.     CrossRef
• Effect of different surface treatments and multimode adhesive application on the Weibull characteristics, wettability, surface topography and adhesion to CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramic
  Karina Barbosa Souza, Dayanne Monielle Duarte Moura, Sarah Emille Gomes da Silva, Gabriela Monteiro de Araújo, Rafael de Almeida Spinelli Pinto, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira Leite, Mutlu Özcan, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção e Souza
  Journal of Applied Oral Science.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Effects of the ratio of silane to 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogenphosphate (MDP) in primer on bonding performance of silica-based and zirconia ceramics
  Minkhant Koko, Tomohiro Takagaki, Ahmed Abdou, Masanao Inokoshi, Masaomi Ikeda, Takahiro Wada, Motohiro Uo, Toru Nikaido, Junji Tagami
  Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials.2020; 112: 104026.     CrossRef
• Influence of surface treatments and repair materials on the shear bond strength of CAD/CAM provisional restorations
  Ki-Won Jeong, Sung-Hun Kim
  The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics.2019; 11(2): 95.     CrossRef
• Microtensile bond strengths of adhesively bonded polymer-based CAD/CAM materials to dentin
  Nuray CAPA, Esra CAN SAY, Cansin CELEBI, Ayca CASUR
  Dental Materials Journal.2019; 38(1): 75.     CrossRef
• Simplified Surface Treatments for Ceramic Cementation: Use of Universal Adhesive and Self-Etching Ceramic Primer
  Heloísa A. B. Guimarães, Paula C. Cardoso, Rafael A. Decurcio, Lúcio J. E. Monteiro, Letícia N. de Almeida, Wellington F. Martins, Ana Paula R. Magalhães
  International Journal of Biomaterials.2018; 2018: 1.     CrossRef
• Effects of surface treatments on repair bond strength of a new CAD/CAM ZLS glass ceramic and two different types of CAD/CAM ceramics
  Ayse Seda Ataol, Gulfem Ergun
  Journal of Oral Science.2018; 60(2): 201.     CrossRef
• An in vitro evaluation of fracture load of implant‐supported zirconia‐based prostheses fabricated with different veneer materials
  Hiroki Takata, Futoshi Komine, Junichi Honda, Markus B. Blatz, Hideo Matsumura
  Clinical Oral Implants Research.2018; 29(4): 396.     CrossRef
• Effects of multiple firings on mechanical properties and resin bonding of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic
  Hongliang Meng, Haifeng Xie, Lu Yang, Bingzhuo Chen, Ying Chen, Huaiqin Zhang, Chen Chen
  Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials.2018; 88: 362.     CrossRef

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  

• Effect of Acid or Laser Treatment on Degradation of Dentin Matrix
  Aslihan Usumez, Tugrul Sari, Roda Seseogullari Dirihan, Mehmet Esad Guven, Serra Oguz Ahmet, Norbert Gutknecht, Arzu Tezvergil Mutluay
  Lasers in Dental Science.2022; 6(2): 99.     CrossRef
• Ablation of carious dental tissue using an ultrashort pulsed laser (USPL) system
  Christoph Engelbach, Claudia Dehn, Christoph Bourauel, Jörg Meister, Matthias Frentzen
  Lasers in Medical Science.2015; 30(5): 1427.     CrossRef

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  

• Enamel pretreatment with Er:YAG laser: effects on the microleakage of fissure sealant in fluorosed teeth
  Mahtab Memarpour, Nasrin Kianimanesh, Bahareh Shayeghi
  Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics.2014; 39(3): 180.     CrossRef

The purpose of this study was to compare the microshear bond strength of a self-etching primer adhesive to dentin prepared with different diamond points, carbide burs and SiC papers, and also to determine which SiC paper yield similar strength to that of dentinal surface prepared with points or burs.

Fifty-six human molar were sectioned to expose the occlusal dentinal surfaces of crowns and slabs of 1.2 mm thick were made. Dentinal surfaces were removed with three diamond points, two carbide burs, and three SiC papers. They were divided into one of eight equal groups (n = 7); Group 1: standard diamond point(TF-12), Group 2: fine diamond point (TF-12F), Group 3: extrafine diamond point (TF-12EF), Group 4: plain-cut carbide bur (no. 245), Group 5: cross-cut carbide bur (no. 557), Group 6 : P 120-grade SiC paper, Group 7: P 220-grade SiC paper, Group 8: P 800-grade SiC paper.

Clearfil SE Bond was applied on dentinal surface and Clearfil AP-X was placed on dentinal surface using Tygon tubes. After the bonded specimens were subjected to uSBS testing, the mean uSBS (n = 20 for each group) was statistically compared using one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD test.

In conclusion, the use of extrafine diamond point is recommended for improved bonding of Clearfil SE Bond to dentin. Also the use of P 220-grade SiC paper in vitro will be yield the results closer to dentinal surface prepared with fine diamond point or carbide burs in vivo.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  

• Comparison of shear bond strength between various temporary prostheses resin blocks fabricated by subtractive and additive manufacturing methods bonded to self-curing reline resin
  Hyo-Min Ryu, Jin-Han Lee
  The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics.2023; 61(3): 189.     CrossRef
• The Effect of Aging and Different Surface Treatments on Temporary Cement Bonding of Temporaray Crown Materials
  Sebahat FINDIK AYDINER, Nuran YANIKOĞLU, Zeynep YEŞİL DUYMUŞ
  Cumhuriyet Dental Journal.2023; 26(2): 144.     CrossRef
• Influence of surface treatments and repair materials on the shear bond strength of CAD/CAM provisional restorations
  Ki-Won Jeong, Sung-Hun Kim
  The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics.2019; 11(2): 95.     CrossRef
• Shear bond strength of dental CAD-CAM hybrid restorative materials repaired with composite resin
  Yun-Hee Moon, Jonghyuk Lee, Myung-Gu Lee
  The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics.2016; 54(3): 193.     CrossRef
• Microshear bond strength of a self-etching primer adhesive to enamel according to the type of bur
  Jin-Ho Jeong, Young-Gon Cho, Myung-Seon Lee
  Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2011; 36(6): 477.     CrossRef

The purpose of this study was to compare the normal and two times of application time of six self-etching primers applied to enamel using microshear bond strength (uSBS) test and the finding of scanning electronic microscope (SEM).

Crown of sixty human molars were bisected mesiodistally and buccal and lingual enamel of crowns were partially exposed and polished with 600 grit SiC papers. They were divided into one of two equal groups subdivided into one of six equal groups (n = 10) by self-etching primer adhesives.

After the same manufacture's adhesive resin and composites were bonded on the enamel surface of each group, the bonded specimens were subjected to uSBS testing and also observed under SEM.

In conclusion, generally two times of primer application time increased the enamel uSBS, especially with the statistical increase of bond strength in adhesives involving high-pH primers.

This study was to compare the microshear bond strength (µSBS) of light- and chemically cured composites to enamel coupled with four 2-step self-etch adhesives and also to evaluate the incompatibility between 2-step self-etch adhesives and chemically cured composite resin.

Crown segments of extracted human molars were cut mesiodistally, and a 1 mm thickness of specimen was made. They were assigned to four groups by adhesives used: SE group (Clearfil SE Bond), AdheSE group (AdheSE), Tyrian group (Tyrian SPE/One-Step Plus), and Contax group (Contax). Each adhesive was applied to a cut enamel surface as per the manufacturer's instruction. Light-cured (Filtek Z250) or chemically cured composite (Luxacore Smartmix Dual) was bonded to the enamel of each specimen using a Tygon tube. After storage in distilled water for 24 hours, the bonded specimens were subjected to µSBS testing with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. The mean µSBS (n=20 for each group) was statistically compared using two-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD, and t test at 95% level. Also the interface of enamel and composite was evaluated under FE-SEM.

The results of this study were as follows;

1. The µSBS of the SE Bond group to the enamel was significantly higher than that of the AdheSE group, the Tyrian group, and the Contax group in both the light-cured and the chemically cured composite resin (p < 0.05).

2. There was not a significant difference among the AdheSE group, the Tyrian group, and the Contax group in both the light-cured and the chemically cured composite resin.

3. The µSBS of the light-cured composite resin was significantly higher than that of the chemically cured composite resin when same adhesive was applied to the enamel (p < 0.05).

4. The interface of enamel and all 2-step self-etch adhesives showed close adaptation, and so the incompatibility of the chemically cured composite resin did not show.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  

• Effect of pre-heating on some physical properties of composite resin
  Myoung Uk Jin, Sung Kyo Kim
  Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2009; 34(1): 30.     CrossRef

This study compared the microshear bond strength (µSBS) of light-cured and dual-cured composites to enamel bonded with three self-etching adhesives. Crown segments of extracted human molars were cut mesiodistally, and 1 mm thickness of specimen was made. They were assigned to three groups by used adhesives: Xeno group (Xeno III), Adper group (Adper Prompt L-Pop), and AQ group (AQ Bond). Each adhesive was applied to cut enamel surface as per manufacturer's instruction. Light-cured (Filtek Z 250) or dual-cured composite (Luxacore) was bonded to enamel of each specimen using Tygon tube.

After storage in distilled water for 24 hours, the bonded specimens were subjected to µSBS testing with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. The mean µSBS (n = 20 for each group) was statistically compared using two-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD, and t test at the 0.05 probability level. The results of this study were as follows;

1. The µSBS of light-cured composite was significantly higher than that of dual-cured composite when same adhesive was applied to enamel.

2. For Z 250, the µSBS of AQ group (9.95 ± 2.51 MPa) to enamel was significantly higher than that of Adper goup (6.74 ± 1.80 MPa), but not significantly different with Xeno group (7.73 ± 2.01 MPa).

3. For Luxacore, the µSBS of Xeno group (5.19 ± 1.32 MPa) to enamel was significantly higher than that of Adper goup (3.41 ± 1.19 MPa), but not significantly different with AQ group (4.50 ± 0.96 MPa).

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  

• Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strengths Between Dual Cure Resin Cement and Light Cure Resin Cement in Root Surface Indirect Restorations: An In Vitro Analysis Study
  Karishma Desai, Karthickraj S M
  Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Difference in bond strength according to filling techniques and cavity walls in box-type occlusal composite resin restoration
  Eun-Joo Ko, Dong-Hoon Shin
  Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2009; 34(4): 350.     CrossRef
• Effect of an intermediate bonding resin and flowable resin on the compatibility of two-step total etching adhesives with a self-curing composite resin
  Sook-Kyung Choi, Ji-Wan Yum, Hyeon-Cheol Kim, Bock Hur, Jeong-Kil Park
  Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2009; 34(5): 397.     CrossRef

This study compared the microshear bond strength (µSBS) to end and side of enamel rod bonded by four adhesives including two total etch adhesives and two self-etch adhesives.

Crown segments of extracted human molars were cut mesiodistally. The outer buccal or lingual surface was used as specimens cutting the ends of enamel rods, and inner slabs used as specimens cutting the sides of enamel rods.

They were assigned to four groups by used adhesives: Group 1 (All-Bond 2), Group 2 (Single Bond), Group 3 (Tyrian SPE/One-Step Plus), Group 4 (Adper Prompt L-Pop). After each adhesive was applied to enamel surface, three composite cylinders were adhered to it of each specimen using Tygon tube. After storage in distilled water for 24 hours, the bonded specimens were subjected to µSBS testing with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. The results of this study were as follows;

1. The µSBS of Group 2 (16.50 ± 2.31 _MPa) and Group 4 (15.83 ± 2.33 _MPa) to the end of enamel prism was significantly higher than that of Group 1 (11.93 ± 2.25 _MPa) and Group 3 (11.97 ± 2.05 _MPa) (p < 0.05).

2. The µSBS of Group 2 (13.43 ± 2.93 _MPa) to the side of enamel prism was significantly higher than that of Group 1 (8.64 ± 1.53 _MPa), Group 3 (9.69 ± 1.80 _MPa), and Group 4 (10.56 ± 1.75 _MPa) (p < 0.05).

3. The mean µSBS to the end of enamel rod was significantly higher than that to the side of enamel rod in all group (p < 0.05).

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  

• Enamel adhesion of light- and chemical-cured composites coupled by two step self-etch adhesives
  Sae-Hee Han, Eun-Soung Kim, Young-Gon Cho
  Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2007; 32(3): 169.     CrossRef

This study evaluated the microshear bond strength of composte resin to teeth bleached with commercial whitening strips and compared with those bleached with home bleaching gel. Twelve extracted human central incisors were cut into pieces and central four segments were chosen from each tooth and embedded in acrylic resin. Four blocks with 12 tooth segments embedded in acrylic resin were acquired and numbered from group one to group four. Group 1 was bleached with Crest Whitestrips, group 2 with Claren, group 3 with Opalescence tooth whitening gel (10% carbamide peroxide). Group 4 was used as control. The bleaching procedure was conducted for 14 days according to the manufacturer's instructions; the bleaching strips twice a day for 30 min and the bleaching gel once a day for 2 hr. After bleaching, composite resin (Filtek Supreme) was bonded to the enamel surfaces with a self-etching adhesive (Adper Prompt L-Pop) using Tygon tube. Microshear bond strength was tested with a universal testing machine (EZ-test). The data were statistically analysed by one-way ANOVA. The study resulted in no statistical differences in microshear bond strength between the tooth segments bleached with 2 different whitening strips and bleaching gel. It can be concluded that the effect of bleaching with either commercial whitening strips or bleaching gel on enamel is minimal in bonding with self-etching adhesive to composite resin.