Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

Search
Advanced Search
OPEN ACCESS
mobile search button mobile menu button

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 34(5); 2009 > Article
Original Article The effects of dentin bonding agent thickness on stress distribution of composite-tooth interface : Finite element method
Sang-Il Park, Yemi Kim, Byoung-Duk Roh
2009;34(5):-449.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.5.442
Published online: September 30, 2009

Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Korea.

Corresponding author: Byoung-Duk Roh. Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, 134 Shinchon-dong, Seodamun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Korea. Tel: 82-2-2228-3146, Fax: 82-2-313-7575, operatys16@yuhs.ac
• Received: July 24, 2009   • Revised: August 15, 2009   • Accepted: August 22, 2009

Copyright © 2009 The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry

  • 465 Views
  • 1 Download
  • 1 Crossref
prev next
Full Article

Download PDF Download PDF

  • The aim of this study was to examine that thick dentin bonding agent application or low modulus composite restoration could reduce stresses on dentin bonding agent layer.
    A mandibular first premolar with abfraction lesion was modeled by finite element method. The lesion was restored by different composite resins with variable dentin bonding agent thickness (50µm, 100µm, 150µm). 170N of occlusal loading was applied buccally or lingually. Von Mises stress on dentin bonding agent layer were measured.
    When thickness of dentin bonding agent was increased von Mises stresses at dentin bonding agent were decreased in both composites. Lower elastic modulus composite restoration showed decreased von Mises stresses. On root dentin margin more stresses were generated than enamel margin.
    For occlusal stress relief at dentin boning agent layer to applicate thick dentin bonding agent or to choose low elastic modulus composite is recommended.
  • Keywords: Class V cavity; composite resin; dentin bonding agent; stress-distribution; finite element method
Figure 1
2-D finite element model simulated in this study.
jkacd-34-442-g001.jpg
Figure 2
von Mises stress at Z100 when buccal loading applied
jkacd-34-442-g002.jpg
Figure 3
von Mises stress at Tetric Flow when buccal loading applied
jkacd-34-442-g003.jpg
Figure 4
von Mises stress at Z100 when lingual loading applied
jkacd-34-442-g004.jpg
Figure 5
von Mises stress at Tetric Flow when lingual loading applied
jkacd-34-442-g005.jpg
Figure 6
Principal stress vectors on adhesive when buccal loading applied
jkacd-34-442-g006.jpg
Figure 7
Principal stress vectors on adhesive when lingual loading applied
jkacd-34-442-g007.jpg
Table 1
Experimental models used in this study

a3M Dental Products, St. Paul, USA

bIvoclar Vivadent, FL-9494-Schaan, Liechtenstein

cKerr, Orange, CA, USA

jkacd-34-442-i001.jpg
Table 2
Mechanical properties of the materials used in the study
jkacd-34-442-i002.jpg
  • 1. Grippo JO. Abfractions : a new classification of hard tissue lesions of teeth. J Esthet Dent. 1991;3: 14-19.ArticlePubMed
  • 2. Heymann HO. Examining tooth flexure effects. JADA. 1991;122: 41-47.
  • 3. Lee WC, Eakle WS. Possible role of tensile stress in the etiology of cervical erosive lesions of teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;52: 374-380.ArticlePubMed
  • 4. Stewart GP, Balda BA, Norman RD. The effects of mechanical loading on marginal integrity of composite restorations. Dent Mater. 1986;2: 151-152.ArticlePubMed
  • 5. Sturdevant JR, Lundeen TF, Sluder TB, Leinfelder KF. Three-year study of two light-cured posterior composite resins. Dent Mater. 1986;2: 263-268.ArticlePubMed
  • 6. McCoy RB, Anderson MH, Lepe X, Jonson GH. Clinical success of class V composite resin restorations without mechanical retention. JADA. 1998;129: 593-599.ArticlePubMed
  • 7. Mattison GD. Photoelastic stress analysis of cast gold endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent. 1982;48: 407-411.ArticlePubMed
  • 8. Assif D, Oren E, Marshak BL, Aviv I. Photoelastic analysis of stress transfer by endodontically treated teeth to the supporting structures using different restorative technique. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61: 535-543.PubMed
  • 9. Kuroe T, Itoh H, Caputo AA, Konuma M. Biomechanincs of cervical tooth structure lesions and their restoration. Quintessence Int. 2000;31: 267-274.PubMed
  • 10. Um CM, Kwon HC, Son HH, Cho BH, Rim YI. Finite element analysis of stress distribution according to cavity design of class v composite resin filling. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 1999;24: 67-75.
  • 11. Turner MJ, Clough RW, Martin HC, Topp LJ. Stiffness and deflection analysis of complex structure. J Aero Sci. 1956;23: 805-823.
  • 12. Ausiello P, Apicella A, Davidson CL. Effect of adhesive layer properties on stress distribution in composite restorations-a 3D finite element analysis. Dent Mater. 2002;18: 295-303.ArticlePubMed
  • 13. Rees JS. The effect of variation in occlusal loading on the development of abfraction lesions : a finite element study. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29: 188-193.ArticlePubMed
  • 14. Yaman SD, Sahin M, Aydin C. Finite element analysis of strength characteristics of various resin based restorative materials in class V cavities. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30: 630-641.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 15. Chon CS, Kim HS, Shim JS, Kim YH. Finite element knalysis for elastic modulus of the periodontal ligament in premolar regions. J Korean Soc Precision Eng. 2005;22: 202-209.
  • 16. Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Celis JP, Roos JR, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Assesment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent Res. 1993;72: 1434-1442.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 17. Moon PC, Chang YH. Effect of DBA layer thickness on composite resin shrinkage stress. J Dent Res. 1992;71: 275-283.
  • 18. Choi KK, Cordon JR, Ferracane JL. The effects of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite. J Dent Res. 2000;79: 812-817.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 19. Peter A, Paul SJ, Luthy H, Scharer P. Film thickness of various dentin bonding agents. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24: 568-573.ArticlePubMed
  • 20. Cho BH, Yoo HM, Kim DH. Two-dimensional finite element analysis on the effect of interface condition and retention groove in class v composite resin restoration. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 1998;23: 639-646.
  • 21. Rees JS. Abfraction lesion formation in maxillary incisors, canines and premolars: A finite element study. Eur J Oral Sci. 2003;111: 149-154.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 22. Widmalm SE, Ericsson SG. Maximal bite force with centric and eccentric load. J Oral Rehabil. 1982;9: 445-450.ArticlePubMed
  • 23. Gibbs CH, Mahan PE, Lundeen HC, Brehnan K, Walsh EK, Holbrook WB. Occlusal force during chewing and swallowing as measured by sound transmission. J Prosthet Dent. 1981;46: 443-449.PubMed

Tables & Figures

Figure 1
2-D finite element model simulated in this study.
jkacd-34-442-g001.jpg
Figure 2
von Mises stress at Z100 when buccal loading applied
jkacd-34-442-g002.jpg
Figure 3
von Mises stress at Tetric Flow when buccal loading applied
jkacd-34-442-g003.jpg
Figure 4
von Mises stress at Z100 when lingual loading applied
jkacd-34-442-g004.jpg
Figure 5
von Mises stress at Tetric Flow when lingual loading applied
jkacd-34-442-g005.jpg
Figure 6
Principal stress vectors on adhesive when buccal loading applied
jkacd-34-442-g006.jpg
Figure 7
Principal stress vectors on adhesive when lingual loading applied
jkacd-34-442-g007.jpg
Table 1
Experimental models used in this study

a3M Dental Products, St. Paul, USA

bIvoclar Vivadent, FL-9494-Schaan, Liechtenstein

cKerr, Orange, CA, USA

jkacd-34-442-i001.jpg
Table 2
Mechanical properties of the materials used in the study
jkacd-34-442-i002.jpg

REFERENCES

  • 1. Grippo JO. Abfractions : a new classification of hard tissue lesions of teeth. J Esthet Dent. 1991;3: 14-19.ArticlePubMed
  • 2. Heymann HO. Examining tooth flexure effects. JADA. 1991;122: 41-47.
  • 3. Lee WC, Eakle WS. Possible role of tensile stress in the etiology of cervical erosive lesions of teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;52: 374-380.ArticlePubMed
  • 4. Stewart GP, Balda BA, Norman RD. The effects of mechanical loading on marginal integrity of composite restorations. Dent Mater. 1986;2: 151-152.ArticlePubMed
  • 5. Sturdevant JR, Lundeen TF, Sluder TB, Leinfelder KF. Three-year study of two light-cured posterior composite resins. Dent Mater. 1986;2: 263-268.ArticlePubMed
  • 6. McCoy RB, Anderson MH, Lepe X, Jonson GH. Clinical success of class V composite resin restorations without mechanical retention. JADA. 1998;129: 593-599.ArticlePubMed
  • 7. Mattison GD. Photoelastic stress analysis of cast gold endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent. 1982;48: 407-411.ArticlePubMed
  • 8. Assif D, Oren E, Marshak BL, Aviv I. Photoelastic analysis of stress transfer by endodontically treated teeth to the supporting structures using different restorative technique. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61: 535-543.PubMed
  • 9. Kuroe T, Itoh H, Caputo AA, Konuma M. Biomechanincs of cervical tooth structure lesions and their restoration. Quintessence Int. 2000;31: 267-274.PubMed
  • 10. Um CM, Kwon HC, Son HH, Cho BH, Rim YI. Finite element analysis of stress distribution according to cavity design of class v composite resin filling. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 1999;24: 67-75.
  • 11. Turner MJ, Clough RW, Martin HC, Topp LJ. Stiffness and deflection analysis of complex structure. J Aero Sci. 1956;23: 805-823.
  • 12. Ausiello P, Apicella A, Davidson CL. Effect of adhesive layer properties on stress distribution in composite restorations-a 3D finite element analysis. Dent Mater. 2002;18: 295-303.ArticlePubMed
  • 13. Rees JS. The effect of variation in occlusal loading on the development of abfraction lesions : a finite element study. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29: 188-193.ArticlePubMed
  • 14. Yaman SD, Sahin M, Aydin C. Finite element analysis of strength characteristics of various resin based restorative materials in class V cavities. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30: 630-641.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 15. Chon CS, Kim HS, Shim JS, Kim YH. Finite element knalysis for elastic modulus of the periodontal ligament in premolar regions. J Korean Soc Precision Eng. 2005;22: 202-209.
  • 16. Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Celis JP, Roos JR, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Assesment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent Res. 1993;72: 1434-1442.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 17. Moon PC, Chang YH. Effect of DBA layer thickness on composite resin shrinkage stress. J Dent Res. 1992;71: 275-283.
  • 18. Choi KK, Cordon JR, Ferracane JL. The effects of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite. J Dent Res. 2000;79: 812-817.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 19. Peter A, Paul SJ, Luthy H, Scharer P. Film thickness of various dentin bonding agents. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24: 568-573.ArticlePubMed
  • 20. Cho BH, Yoo HM, Kim DH. Two-dimensional finite element analysis on the effect of interface condition and retention groove in class v composite resin restoration. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 1998;23: 639-646.
  • 21. Rees JS. Abfraction lesion formation in maxillary incisors, canines and premolars: A finite element study. Eur J Oral Sci. 2003;111: 149-154.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 22. Widmalm SE, Ericsson SG. Maximal bite force with centric and eccentric load. J Oral Rehabil. 1982;9: 445-450.ArticlePubMed
  • 23. Gibbs CH, Mahan PE, Lundeen HC, Brehnan K, Walsh EK, Holbrook WB. Occlusal force during chewing and swallowing as measured by sound transmission. J Prosthet Dent. 1981;46: 443-449.PubMed

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Influence of application methods of one-step self-etching adhesives on microtensile bond strength
    Chul-Kyu Choi, Sung-Ae Son, Jin-Hee Ha, Bock Hur, Hyeon-Cheol Kim, Yong-Hun Kwon, Jeong-Kil Park
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2011; 36(3): 203.     CrossRef
CanvasJS.com
CanvasJS.com
CanvasJS.com

  • ePub LinkePub Link
  • Cite
    CITE
    export Copy Download
    Close
    Download Citation
    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.
    Format:
    • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
    • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
    Include:
    • Citation for the content below
    The effects of dentin bonding agent thickness on stress distribution of composite-tooth interface : Finite element method
    J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2009;34(5):442-449.   Published online September 30, 2009
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.5.442
    Close
  • XML DownloadXML Download
Figure
  • 0
The effects of dentin bonding agent thickness on stress distribution of composite-tooth interface : Finite element method
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
Figure 1 2-D finite element model simulated in this study.
Figure 2 von Mises stress at Z100 when buccal loading applied
Figure 3 von Mises stress at Tetric Flow when buccal loading applied
Figure 4 von Mises stress at Z100 when lingual loading applied
Figure 5 von Mises stress at Tetric Flow when lingual loading applied
Figure 6 Principal stress vectors on adhesive when buccal loading applied
Figure 7 Principal stress vectors on adhesive when lingual loading applied

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7

The effects of dentin bonding agent thickness on stress distribution of composite-tooth interface : Finite element method

Experimental models used in this study

a3M Dental Products, St. Paul, USA

bIvoclar Vivadent, FL-9494-Schaan, Liechtenstein

cKerr, Orange, CA, USA

Mechanical properties of the materials used in the study
Table 1 Experimental models used in this study

a3M Dental Products, St. Paul, USA

bIvoclar Vivadent, FL-9494-Schaan, Liechtenstein

cKerr, Orange, CA, USA

Table 2 Mechanical properties of the materials used in the study

Table 1

Table 2

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
© The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.
Close layer
TOP Mpgyi